Re: LyX meeting in Paris. What about July 14-18?

2005-05-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 06:10:48PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jean-Marc> So, which date shall we choose? For the first week-end, > Jean-Marc> July 15-19 would indeed be a little bit easier to organize, > Jean-Marc>

Re: [PATCH] In-place editing of macro arguments

2005-05-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 09:38:40PM +0200, Sebastian Reichelt wrote: > Hello JMarc! > > >From what I remember, the reason why Andre decided to handle math > >macros like that is because some macro arguments can appear more than > >once in a given macro, like \newcommand{\foo}[2]{#1+#2+#1}. Do you >

Re: LyX frontends

2005-05-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 09:29:12PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 09:55:18PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > > ControlBranch.C (for example) is pretty trivial, > > > > [To a degree that make one wonder whether it is explicitly needed at all > > ... but you are right.] > > I

Re: Packaging of LyX/Win 1.3.6

2005-05-21 Thread Angus Leeming
Michael Schmitt wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > >>>Angus> (I propose not to package python, perl or a shell environment. >>>Angus> Instead I think we should tell people to go and get their own.) >>> >>>How big are these things? >>> >>> >> >>ftp://ftp.python.org/pub/www.python.org/ftp/python/2

Re: [PATCH 1.4] user interface, 2nd try

2005-05-21 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Michael Schmitt wrote: > Please apply. done. Jürgen

Re: [PATCH 1.4] user interface, 2nd try

2005-05-21 Thread John Levon
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 02:47:05PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote: > John, speak to us - we are awaiting your approval. I just got off a long couple of flights from the US, I'm afraid you must wait a little longer until I can see properly :) john

Re: [PATCH 1.4] user interface, 2nd try

2005-05-21 Thread Michael Schmitt
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: This looks good to me, but I'll let John comment too. Just one thing: inset-toggle may not exist anymore, but we have two lfuns instead ... Wouldn't it make sense to add them to the menu? Indeed. The menus should cover all LyX features. I have created a new exte

Re: Bug report: Qt Citations & BibTeX

2005-05-21 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Angus Leeming wrote: > I'm afraid I've got confused by which patch I should be looking at. > I'm also afraid that I've broken it with my "file names with spaces" > patch. If you have the energy to make the patch again, I'll try and > find the energy to look at it carefully :) You didn't break it a

Re: Packaging of LyX/Win 1.3.6

2005-05-21 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> I do believe that LyX 1.3.6 is looking like a realistic > Angus> prospect :) What else is planned? > > Not much... Personally, I'd really like to see José's qt-immodule fixes in 1.3.6 Jürgen

Re: lyx2lyx does not cope with spaces in path names

2005-05-21 Thread Michael Schmitt
Angus Leeming wrote: I think the email subject says it all. It seems that lyx2lyx must be fixed before LyX 1.4 is ready for the Windows platform. Michael could you open a new report on bugzilla for this issue? I plan to fix this issue this week and a bugilla helps not to forget it. :-) Mi

Re: Bug report: Qt Citations & BibTeX

2005-05-21 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > The attached fixes it for me. Both setSelected and setCurrentItem are > necessary, probably because we now have multi selection mode in that > browser (i.e. you can select multiple citation entries at once). > > Please test. No reaction ... I applied this part. Jürge

Re: Some bug reports

2005-05-21 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Michael Schmitt wrote: > 1. New doc; choose "Section" layout; insert short title => Good bye! Confirmed. > 2. New doc; Navigate>Next Note => Good bye! Confirmed (I had to hit it twice, though). > 3. New doc; enter "Hello"; move cursor after "e"; insert index entry => > Cursor is placed after "l

Re: Some bug reports

2005-05-21 Thread John Levon
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 11:05:03PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote: > 4. "Accept All Changes" and "Revert All Changes" should be atomic > operations; otherwise "undo" is a real pain This one's filed already john