This is very strange. Is anyone else seeing this?
In the latest LyX CVS, undo (C-z) is disabled.
---Kayvan
--
Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids:
Sylvan Associates, Inc. | Laura Isabella Sylvan | Katherine Yelena (8/8/89)
http://sylv
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Juergen> Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>>> This is quick implementation of a long-standing feature request:
>>> autoopening/closing collapsables.
>
> Juergen> What is the difference to the LFU
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> The only documents where this piece of code is relevant are
Jose'> those made with 0.10.7 and before. I will thus add this code to
Jose'> the 0.10.7 convertion code and remove this code.
Good.
Jose'> Believe it or not I like to
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>> This is quick implementation of a long-standing feature request:
>> autoopening/closing collapsables.
Juergen> What is the difference to the LFUN ALL_INSETS_TOGGLE, which
Juergen> Angus has i
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> This is quick implementation of a long-standing feature request:
> autoopening/closing collapsables.
What is the difference to the LFUN ALL_INSETS_TOGGLE, which Angus has
implemented?
If it would be that insets would be closed again after f&r or spellchecking,
I'm all
Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | This is quick implementation of a long-standing feature request:
> | autoopening/closing collapsables. This is really easy with the new
> | scheme (most of this patch is a replace of status_ -> status())
>
> No no
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This is quick implementation of a long-standing feature request:
| autoopening/closing collapsables. This is really easy with the new scheme
| (most of this patch is a replace of status_ -> status())
No no no :-)
We had that and we removed it...
