Re: [PATCH] Search/replace dialog for GTK+ frontend

Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 12:46:41AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> | John Spray wrote: >> > >> >> On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 21:09, Angus Leeming wrote: >> >>> No worries. The patch looks good; I commited

Re: [PATCH] Fix and enable GTK+ print dialog

John Spray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi, > | Today's gtk+ improvement: make the print dialog work. > | * GPrint.C: minor fixes to make it compile and work, get | rid of "Apply" | * Dialogs.C: move from FormPrint to GPrint | * Makefile.am: move from FormPrint to GPrint | * glade/print

[PATCH] Fix and enable GTK+ print dialog

Hi, Today's gtk+ improvement: make the print dialog work. * GPrint.C: minor fixes to make it compile and work, get rid of "Apply" * Dialogs.C: move from FormPrint to GPrint * Makefile.am: move from FormPrint to GPrint * glade/print.glade: rearrange, gtk stock button for Print, get rid

Re: clicking inside math

Andre Poenitz wrote: > It gives us an anchor to the region of the buffer that needs all the > graphical 'helpers', position cache etc. The rest of the buffer does not > need this information at all. > > [This also means that the position and metrics cached could be > completely moved off the buff

Re: clicking inside math

Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > cvs. Where's the patch? (point to the archives / resend please) Never mind, I've found it. >> The idea of the patch is fairly simple: Forget all about coordinates and >> just decide where the cursor should be drawn on screen (of course one >> should somehow take the

Re: [PATCH] Search/replace dialog for GTK+ frontend

On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 12:46:41AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | John Spray wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 21:09, Angus Leeming wrote: > >>> No worries. The patch looks good; I commited it. > >> What, no coding-style criticisms? You're

Re: Get rid of ShareContainer

On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 01:04:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > I want to get rid of the ShareContainer. It was a fun project when I > did it, but IMO it just complicates the code and makes it slower. Sure > we get a smaller memory footprint by using it, but the > unmaintainability of the

Re: Get rid of ShareContainer

Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote: > > I want to get rid of the ShareContainer. It was a fun project when I > did it, but IMO it just complicates the code and makes it slower. Sure > we get a smaller memory footprint by using it, but the > unmaintainability of the code outweighs that benefit. > > Opinio

[patch] Look for tex2lyx instead of reLyX

Is this all that is needed to use tex2lyx as default latex->lyx translator? Or are there some importer stuff that must be done as well? ? tex2lyx-1.diff Index: configure.m4 === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/lib/configure

[patch] Make LyX Gtk work with Gtkmm 2.4

This patch is not really for inclusion, but is more for people interested in getting gtk 2.4 to work with LyX. It would IMHO be nice to change to this fairly quick since gtkmm 2.0 does not work very well with gcc 3.4 (or 4.0). The changes are not that big, but the toolbar will need a reimplement

Re: [PATCH] Search/replace dialog for GTK+ frontend

Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) > writes: > > | Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > | | John Spray wrote: >>> On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 21:09, Angus Leeming wrote: > No worries. The patch looks good; I commited it. What, no coding-style cr

Re: [PATCH] Closing tag insetref for Docbook XML

On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 09:41:42PM +0200, Andreas Vox wrote: > Hi, > > here it is. The Changelog entry is at the beginning of the patch file. Notice that the ChangeLog didn't refered that function changed, docbook in this case. I have fixed that. So your first patch is commited, congratulatio

Re: [PATCH] Search/replace dialog for GTK+ frontend

On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 09:40:26AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > Hmm... I really am a nice guy even if I sound a bit harsh sometimes. True. The boss is a nice guy. (now try that with an irish accent and it will sound better.) ;-) Greetings to you all from Dublin. :-) > -- > Lgb

Get rid of ShareContainer

I want to get rid of the ShareContainer. It was a fun project when I did it, but IMO it just complicates the code and makes it slower. Sure we get a smaller memory footprint by using it, but the unmaintainability of the code outweighs that benefit. Opinions? -- Lgb

Re: tex2pdf and reLyX

Angus, many thanks for the insightful comments. We use tex2lyx & lyx2lyx. Thanks, Rainer Am Freitag, 24. September 2004 18:42 schrieb Angus Leeming: > Rainer Dorsch wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am looking for a way to convert a larger amount of LaTeX code to LyX. > > > > I found there is > > - re

Re: [PATCH] Search/replace dialog for GTK+ frontend

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | | John Spray wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 21:09, Angus Leeming wrote: No worries. The patch looks good; I commited it. >>> What, no coding-style criticisms? You're just not trying today! :-

Re: clicking inside math

Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 08:41:03PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: >> it seems that coordinate detection of nested math insets are messed up >> for other than the first page of the document. >> >> If you go scroll down you cannot click inside some nested math inset, the >>