Re: Mailing lists

2004-08-11 Thread lyx
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 09:44:54PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > I just wonder: Have the mailing lists been re-configured in any way such > that I don't receive my own mails anymore? Why not send me a copy of an email you think has not made it back to you. Mate

Re: list back

2004-08-11 Thread lyx
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 02:19:33PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > | I am told we (the lyx lists) are back. > > Have they actually been down? Yes, for 8 hours. Mate

Re: Getting Lyx working

2004-08-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jose'> I agree since the changes were collateral. But this was Jose'> really an imaginative bug, for sure. :-) Sure. "Lyx, only the best bugs!" has been my motto for some time. JMarc

Re: Getting Lyx working

2004-08-11 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 15:06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Jose'> FWIW I think that we (no, not Lars) and not Jean-Marc should > Jose'> be those to blame. > > What do you mean? Did you do something wrong recently? You can tell us > everything you know... We are not here to judge your acti

Re: Getting Lyx working

2004-08-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jose'> On Wednesday 11 August 2004 14:35, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> That's to make sure that the tar.gz has not been changed on >> ftp.lyx.org by some nasty pirate. One can put amusing trojans in >> the configure script, for example.

Re: Getting Lyx working

2004-08-11 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 14:35, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > That's to make sure that the tar.gz has not been changed on > ftp.lyx.org by some nasty pirate. One can put amusing trojans in the > configure script, for example. Like erasing the /dev/null? ;-) For those with a small memory

Re: Getting Lyx working

2004-08-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> OK. And what about signing our packages in similar fashion to Angus> the FSF? Actually, I never really understood what this Angus> achieves. That's to make sure that the tar.gz has not been changed on ftp.lyx.org by some nasty pira

Re: Getting Lyx working

2004-08-11 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> It would make sense to have such checksums for the tar files > Angus> though, don't you think? > > Thats's more... Oops, I already used this argument. > > But seriously, did we have many people complain about broken > downloads? If the download is corrupted, g

Re: Getting Lyx working

2004-08-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Apparently not. The md5sum is automatically included in the rpm Angus> file and is checked by the rpm tool before it does anything Angus> else. Angus> It would make sense to have such checksums for the tar files Angus> though, don'

Re: Getting Lyx working

2004-08-11 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> writes: > > Angus> I've just received this response from a user trying to extract > Angus> the rpm for RH9. Is the rpm corrupt? > > I am the one who made it, and I just tried to install the rpm that I > got fr

Re: Getting Lyx working

2004-08-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> I've just received this response from a user trying to extract Angus> the rpm for RH9. Is the rpm corrupt? I am the one who made it, and I just tried to install the rpm that I got from ftp.lyx.org. It just worked. Angus> As an asi

Re: list back

2004-08-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | I am told we (the lyx lists) are back. Have they actually been down? -- Lgb

list back

2004-08-11 Thread lyx
I am told we (the lyx lists) are back. Mate

Re: [PATCHes] Some FileDialog work

2004-08-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> On Aug 10, 2004, at 10:41 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> I think that for consistency we should use the same dialogs >> everywhere. It would not make much sense to use the aqua dialogs >> for everything but open/save, would i

Re: Testing again.

2004-08-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 09:34:14AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Friday 13. aug. > 0630 -> leaving Oslo > 0840 -> arriving Frankfurt > 1215 -> leaving Frankfurt > 1310 -> arriving Dresden > > I'll be bored in Frankfurt for sure... Given that Frankfurt Airport is pretty close to the city (ni

Re: Testing again.

2004-08-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 08:58:24AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> | Either I have still some serious mail troubles or everybody keeps >> | ignoring meeting related messages... >> >> :-) >> >> I wil

Re: Testing again.

2004-08-11 Thread Jose' Matos
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 18:37, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > I will arrive to Dresden next Thursday at 13.30, I think that > > Jean-Marc will arrive soon after that. Am I correct? > > I thought he said '12:30'. Depending on your localization of 'after' and > 'soon' this might translate to 'soon afte

Re: Testing again.

2004-08-11 Thread Jose' Matos
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 18:37, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > I will arrive to Dresden next Thursday at 13.30, I think that > > Jean-Marc will arrive soon after that. Am I correct? > > I thought he said '12:30'. Depending on your localization of 'after' and > 'soon' this might translate to 'soon afte