Re: [patch] LyXSocket cleanup

2004-07-19 Thread Joao Luis Meloni Assirati
Lars wrote: > | Index: lyxsocket.C > | - fd_(lyx::support::socktools::listen(addr, MAX_CLIENTS)), > | + fd_(lyx::support::socktools::listen(addr, 3)), > The use of MAX_CLIENTS here is not doing what the original author > thinks it does. The backlog parameter is just how many _o

Re: inverse dvi search and source specials

2004-07-19 Thread Joao Luis Meloni Assirati
Em Seg 19 Jul 2004 19:11, vocĂȘ escreveu: > Lars wrote: > > How are the source specials generated for the dvi generated from LyX? > > I cannot find any -src-specials arg to dvi that we use? > > They are generated by latex with the switch --src-specials (you need to > change by hand the converter Lat

Re: inverse dvi search and source specials

2004-07-19 Thread Joao Luis Meloni Assirati
Lars wrote: > How are the source specials generated for the dvi generated from LyX? > I cannot find any -src-specials arg to dvi that we use? They are generated by latex with the switch --src-specials (you need to change by hand the converter Latex->DVI). With this option, latex will insert a s

latexbeamer

2004-07-19 Thread Angus Leeming
When I load a latexbeamer doc, these warnings are printed to console (multiple times). What needs to change in the layout file? step: Counter does not exist: lyxframeend{}\section value: Counter does not exist: enumiii value: Counter does not exist: enumiv (This is with 1.3.x.) -- Angus

Re: change-tracking status?

2004-07-19 Thread Angus Leeming
Vaclav Smidl wrote: > Actually, I played with it and I found that LyX crashes anytime > (even without change-tracking) when I try to insert Math. > > gdb says: > #0 0x0816ce08 in (anonymous namespace)::mathDispatch > #([EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], display=false) at text3.C:141 > i.

Re: change-tracking status?

2004-07-19 Thread Vaclav Smidl
On Friday 16 July 2004 21:13, Andre Poenitz wrote: > Change tracking used to work as a patch against LyX 1.2.x fairly > well, but during the core changes in the 1.3 -> 1.4 transition it was > broken, mainly because nobody actively used it in 1.3 and so it wasn't > double-checked. If you want to bla