On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 01:03:07PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > PS Branches doesn't seem to work properly in CVS now -- I should look
> > at it or at least file a bug.
>
> Good idea ;-)
>
> Alfredo
Actually it's not as bad as it looks. The problem was
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> This is a quick-hacked inlined-in-open mode as Andre's proposal. Seems to
>> work, but I didn't test it much.
>>
>> Comments?
>
> If it works... I just wonder why it adds code...
Well it's just to accommodate two different ways of drawing things in the
place of one (and
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 11:48:03AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> This is a quick-hacked inlined-in-open mode as Andre's proposal. Seems to
> work, but I didn't test it much.
>
> Comments?
If it works... I just wonder why it adds code...
Andre'
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> PS Branches doesn't seem to work properly in CVS now -- I should look
> at it or at least file a bug.
Good idea ;-)
Alfredo
This is a quick-hacked inlined-in-open mode as Andre's proposal. Seems to
work, but I didn't test it much.
Comments?
Alfredo
? insetcollapsable-save.C
? insettext-save.C
Index: insetcollapsable.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> In theory, this could be used in undo instead of the current triplet
> (quadrupel) of data. Unfortunately, DocIterator is too slow for it
> (currently) (~30s for traversing the UserGuide)
Do you have an idea why is it slow? We should make it fast enough; then we
could ditch
Hi,
I have written an article on LyX and the Branches feature. It is at
http://www.hut.fi/~mvermeer/multilingual.pdf
I wrote it a bit quickly, so please check if you see any errors,
especially misrepresentations.
The audience for this article is the European educational thematic
network
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andrà probably you have a better fix for them, but on the meantime this
> seems to work reasonably ok.
Applied this one-liner as it renders cvs usable.
Alfredo
