Re: [Updated PATCH] preview wrong formula with a [formula does not compile] box.

2004-01-10 Thread Bo Peng
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 05:31:43PM -0600, Bo Peng wrote: > The updated patch is attached. Has anyone got a chance to test this patch? -- Bo Peng

Re: lyx::support::tempName

2004-01-10 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Angus Leeming wrote: > However, the real change I would like is in the implementation. I > would like to 'unlink' the generated temporary file. It's a royal > PITA in my view and the function name offers no suggestion that it'll > generate a file; that's just an implementat

lyx::support::tempName

2004-01-10 Thread Angus Leeming
I've adopted the strategy of 'gently-does-it' in adapting the graphics code to use boost::filesystem::path. This has lead me to introduce path versions of functions in src/support as and when I need them. Obviously the aim is to eventually remove the std::string versions. For example, the std::

Re: Why buffer->niceFile()?

2004-01-10 Thread Angus Leeming
Georg Baum wrote: > I tried, bit it did not work. The only place where it is needed > seems to be InsetInclude::validate(). Can you not pass the runparams to the inset::validate member functions then? -- Angus

Re: Why buffer->niceFile()?

2004-01-10 Thread Georg Baum
Am Freitag, 9. Januar 2004 13:45 schrieb Angus Leeming: > Georg Baum wrote: > > > Just a short question: For what purpose is buffer->niceFile there? > > It is used in insetgraphics and insetinclude, but both have access > > to runparams.nice which should serve the same purpose. Can > > buffer->nic

Re: boost::filesystem

2004-01-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Vitaly Lipatov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 8 Январь 2004 19:46, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Are you sure you don't want to try a 1.31 release candidate >> instead... :-) >> >> I could apply that in about five minutes ... >> >> Or.. I'll just do the 1.30.2 for now... | Tell me please

Re: boost::filesystem

2004-01-10 Thread Vitaly Lipatov
On 8 ÑÑ 2004 19:46, Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote: > Are you sure you don't want to try a 1.31 release candidate > instead... :-) > > I could apply that in about five minutes ... > > Or.. I'll just do the 1.30.2 for now... Tell me please, can I build LyX without insided boost? I'd like to use syste

Re: .lyx/preferences needs a warning

2004-01-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Christian" == Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Christian> I think the ability to re-read the bind-files etc without Christian> start/stopping lyx is more import A simple solution would be to add new lfuns key-bind and bindfile-read (with better names...). This is trivi