CVS lyx and math power box?

2003-11-27 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
Hi folks, When I enter "^" in math mode (or use the power button in the math panel), I see a "^" and not the box slightly up and to the right that I expect. I remember that this used to work. Did something change? I am using lyx-xforms. ---Kayvan -- Kayvan A. Sylvan

Re: Character styles changeover?

2003-11-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 09:52:11PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: > | Mere specifically: does anybody/anything ever produce any other bar > | than underbar? And shouldn't we just support that trivially as a > | charstyle? > > No... underline/underbar is much more releted to size/bold/it

Re: [patch] long shot #4

2003-11-27 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Andre Poenitz wrote: > Some slight improvements. Clicking in a text inset does at least toggle > nested footnotes, so coordinate computation should not be too far off > anymore. > > This starts getting large. 550 lines removed now, 440 changed. > So I'd really like to commit this... [note: got i

Left margin in tabular cells is too big.

2003-11-27 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
... and makes tabulars way wider than needed. -- Lgb

right margin!

2003-11-27 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Ok, who removed the right margin? Not the look of the main screen looks like something is hidden at the right side all the time... not looking good at all. Can it be put back again please. -- Lgb

question: selection

2003-11-27 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
[Umph... wrong list. Here it is again.] what's selection.mark() / what's the difference with selection.set()? why the assymetry below (text3.C) -- present in 1.3.x btw : case LFUN_BEGINNINGBUF: if (!selection.mark()) clearSelection();

Re: Character styles changeover?

2003-11-27 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 11:50:20AM +0100, Andre Poenitz spake thusly: | >> > 4) ... and what to do with underbar? >> >> *shrug* Ugly as hell and not nice for LaTeX either. I don't use it. so I >> don't care... > | Mere specifically: does anybody/anyt

[patch] long shot #4

2003-11-27 Thread Andre Poenitz
Some slight improvements. Clicking in a text inset does at least toggle nested footnotes, so coordinate computation should not be too far off anymore. This starts getting large. 550 lines removed now, 440 changed. So I'd really like to commit this... Andre' 1.diff.gz Description: application/g

feature request

2003-11-27 Thread Markus B.
Hi, I have been using Klyx for a long time and I appreciate it very much. Yet, the feature that I am missing in Lyx is a switch, either a menu entry or a button to open/close all footnotes at once. This feature was available in Klyx. Actually, I would need it quite badly because I am writing

Re: [Patch] Class Header

2003-11-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 09:43:56AM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly: > On Thursday 27 November 2003 09:23, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > I was talking about linuxdoc using class header. :=) > > > > Ah. > > > > Yes, near-trivial. Like attached. Shall I do it? > > Yes, please. > > > - Martin >

Re: Character styles changeover?

2003-11-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 11:50:20AM +0100, Andre Poenitz spake thusly: > > 4) ... and what to do with underbar? > > *shrug* Ugly as hell and not nice for LaTeX either. I don't use it. so I > don't care... Mere specifically: does anybody/anything ever produce any other bar than underbar? And shou

Re: [Patch] XML sanitation part II

2003-11-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 10:25:32AM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: > > Shrug shrug. How do you test a thing like this? I ran LyX to produce > > both a LaTeX file and a PDF, and nothing untoward seemed to happen. > > Both files look OK. > > > > So I'll just check this in then, right? Any other o

Re: Character styles changeover?

2003-11-27 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 02:24:44PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > I agree that not suppressing should be the default mode, but > nevertheless I'd like to have a 'line noise free proof read mode'. Well it might be nice but I don't think it's necessary for 1.4.0. Later the same UI mechanism can hand

Re: Character styles changeover?

2003-11-27 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 11:15:06AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > 3) Reading a text containing charstyle insets is not very fluent. > > You need to open the inset to see what it contains, unpleasant in > > running text. We would need either the inlined inset we have for > >

Re: Character styles changeover?

2003-11-27 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 11:46:00AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I think the inline code in ERT insets should be moved to collapsable > insets (and add a bool to collapsable inset indicating whether it > allows for inline). Also the code for showing part of the inset note that I've ported

Re: Character styles changeover?

2003-11-27 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 11:46:00AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Martin> We would need either the inlined inset we have for ERT, or > Martin> display of the collapsed inset's content on the button if it > Martin> is short, also from ERT. Ideas? > > I think the inline code in ERT insets shou

Re: Character styles changeover?

2003-11-27 Thread Angus Leeming
Martin Vermeer wrote: > 3) Reading a text containing charstyle insets is not very fluent. > You need to open the inset to see what it contains, unpleasant in > running text. We would need either the inlined inset we have for > ERT, or display of the collapsed inset's content on the button if it > i

Re: Character styles changeover?

2003-11-27 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 11:12:14AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > So now that we have character styles as insets, what to do with them? > Should we remove the charstyles from character attributes, and convert > old documents forward? > > BTW What are the implications? I see several. > > 1) Inside

Re: Character styles changeover?

2003-11-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> 1) Inside a charstyle inset (like Noun or Emph) you cannot use Martin> char attributes. Everything comes out inheriting the Martin> attributes of the surrounding text (in LaTeX that is, not on Martin> screen; weird. Is this handl

Re: [Patch] XML sanitation part II

2003-11-27 Thread Angus Leeming
On Thursday 27 November 2003 7:33 am, Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:02:14PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: > > > Eh? But isn't this patch functionally neutral? (I intended it to be) > > > > Shrug. I don't know. I'm just an ignorant old bloke with a headache ;-) > > Shrug sh

Re: [Patch] Class Header

2003-11-27 Thread Jose' Matos
On Thursday 27 November 2003 09:23, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > I was talking about linuxdoc using class header. :=) > > Ah. > > Yes, near-trivial. Like attached. Shall I do it? Yes, please. > - Martin -- José Abílio

Re: [Patch] Class Header

2003-11-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 07:30:03AM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly: > On Wednesday 26 November 2003 20:18, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 04:01:59PM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly: > > > > Patch attached. > > > > > > That is perfect. :-) > > > As I have told you linuxdoc c

Character styles changeover?

2003-11-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
So now that we have character styles as insets, what to do with them? Should we remove the charstyles from character attributes, and convert old documents forward? BTW What are the implications? I see several. 1) Inside a charstyle inset (like Noun or Emph) you cannot use char attributes. Everyth

Re: [Devel] Re: crash changing font

2003-11-27 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:59:36PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > > > select text containing a text inset. C-E -> crash > > This seems to solve the problem... So why don't you commit? Andre'

Re: [Patch] Class Header

2003-11-27 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 20:18, Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 04:01:59PM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly: > > > Patch attached. > > > > That is perfect. :-) > > As I have told you linuxdoc can be changed to use the same scheme, that > > will be easy to change. :-) > > In

Re: [Patch] XML sanitation part II

2003-11-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:02:14PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly: > > > > Eh? But isn't this patch functionally neutral? (I intended it to be) > > Shrug. I don't know. I'm just an ignorant old bloke with a headache ;-) Shrug shrug. How do you test a thing like this? I ran LyX to produce both

Change in CharStyle syntax?

2003-11-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
The attached patch (posted earlier erroneously as a bug fix; the 'bug' was betwixt chair and keyboard) would change the CharStyle syntax in the LyX file from \begin_inset to \begin_inset CharStyle to be consistent with the way other insets do it. There is another reason for t

Re: [Patch] Class Header

2003-11-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 04:01:59PM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly: > > On Wednesday 26 November 2003 14:40, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > > > " PUBLIC \"-//OASIS//DTD DocBook V4.1//EN\"" for SGML docbook > > > > > " system" for linuxdoc > > > > > " PUBLIC \"-//AGU//DTD article American Geophysic