On Wednesday 22 October 2003 07:23, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 01:03:34AM +0300, Martin Vermeer spake thusly:
> > If nobody shouts, I'l check this in tomorrow morning. So LyX CVS works
> > again...
> >
> > - Martin
>
> It's in now, with Lars's comment formatting point taken. Pl
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 07:36:57PM +0200, Kostantino wrote:
> Hi.
> In the INSTALL file I read:
>
> --enable-optimization=VALUE enables you to set optimization
> to a higher level as the default (-O), for example
> --enable-optimization=-O3.
>
> So I give the following configure command:
>
> .
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 01:03:34AM +0300, Martin Vermeer spake thusly:
> If nobody shouts, I'l check this in tomorrow morning. So LyX CVS works
> again...
>
> - Martin
It's in now, with Lars's comment formatting point taken. Please shout
if you *now* get '...is a bit silly' warnings. The assert
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 11:45:12PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > +bool display() const { return false; }
> > +
>
> Why do you need these? The function defaults to false (inset.h).
... but these inherit from InsetCommand, which sets it to true
(correc
text not available!
no text in cache!
Assertion triggered in InsetOld* Paragraph::getInset(int) by failing check "pos <
size()" in file ../../lyx/src/paragraph.C:296
Aborted (core dumped)
--
Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids:
Sylvan Associates, Inc. | Laur
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Index: text.C
| ===
| RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/text.C,v
| retrieving revision 1.467
| diff -u -p -r1.467 text.C
| --- text.C21 Oct 2003 13:04:13 - 1.467
|
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> +bool display() const { return false; }
> +
Why do you need these? The function defaults to false (inset.h).
--
Angus
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 07:17:22PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
>
> - if (point == last || chunkwidth >= width - left)
> - point = (pos < i) ? i - 1 : i;
> - break;
> + if (point == last || chunkwidth >
John Levon wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 07:36:57PM +0200, Kostantino wrote:
>
> > but after the make command I read:
> >
> > g++: unrecognised option '-03'
>
> You typed zero-three "-03" instead of oh-three "-O3". See ?
>
Oh! Good spotting John. I can't believe how stupid IBM was
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 04:54:07PM +0100, Jose' Matos spake thusly:
> On Tuesday 21 October 2003 17:03, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > Assertion triggered in InsetOld* Paragraph::getInset(int) by failing
> > > check "pos < size()" in file paragraph.C:296
> >
> > Just to make sure: does this include
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 07:36:57PM +0200, Kostantino wrote:
> but after the make command I read:
>
> g++: unrecognised option '-03'
You typed zero-three "-03" instead of oh-three "-O3". See ?
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread
Kostantino wrote:
>
> Hi.
> In the INSTALL file I read:
>
> --enable-optimization=VALUE enables you to set optimization
>to a higher level as the default (-O), for example
> --enable-optimization=-O3.
>
> So I give the following configure command:
>
> ./configure --with-frontend=qt --enable
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 18:17, Jose' Matos wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> it is me again. ;-)
> Because of it I get:
> $src/lyx
[several warnings]
> InsetCollapsable::Read: Missing collapsed!
This one is weird since colapsed is there. So something fishy is going on.
:-)
--
José Abílio
Hi.
In the INSTALL file I read:
--enable-optimization=VALUE enables you to set optimization
to a higher level as the default (-O), for example
--enable-optimization=-O3.
So I give the following configure command:
./configure --with-frontend=qt --enable-optimization=-O3
but after the make comman
Jose' Matos wrote:
> Also with lyxl2lyx it does not need to be that way, as I can add
> the different previous value if the defaults changes in the
> new version. This would make easier to read LyX files.
Do this. We do it elsewhere. (graphics, tabular, ...)
If it's documented, it's safe.
-
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 18:25, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:17:24PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> > Do you, and others, think that I should set the default values of
> > the missing parameter?
>
> This adds a bit bloat to the .lyx but is on sthe safe side, isn't it?
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:17:24PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> Do you, and others, think that I should set the default values of
> the missing parameter?
This adds a bit bloat to the .lyx but is on sthe safe side, isn't it?
I'd rather have lyx2lyx on the safe side. The bloat should va
Hi Martin,
it is me again. ;-)
I added the support for minipage convertions to lyx2lyx, but I did not
considered the default values of those values not defined in the 1.3 version.
Because of it I get:
$src/lyx
InsetBox::Read: Missing 'hor_pos'-tag!c
InsetBox::Read: Missin
- if (point == last || chunkwidth >= width - left)
- point = (pos < i) ? i - 1 : i;
- break;
+ if (point == last || chunkwidth >= width - left) {
+ if (pos < i) {
+
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:59:03PM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > > Why don't you let xdvi do it's job instead
> > > of trying manually?
> >
> > Because it does not work, i.e. the cursor does not move. No error
> > message whatsoever. As x
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Why don't you let xdvi do it's job instead
> > of trying manually?
>
> Because it does not work, i.e. the cursor does not move. No error
> message whatsoever. As xdvi does work with EDITOR=vi I figured it might
> be a problem with teh lyxclient <-> Ly
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 17:03, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Assertion triggered in InsetOld* Paragraph::getInset(int) by failing
> > check "pos < size()" in file paragraph.C:296
>
> Just to make sure: does this include this afternoons's commit?
Yes, and it happens not matter the frontend I am us
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 04:17:37PM +0100, Jose' Matos spake thusly:
> Now, after updating since last morning, so just with Martin's patch, I get
> this, opening a file that I have been working on:
>
> (gdb) run
> Starting program: /home/jamatos/lyx/lyx-devel/src/lyx-xforms
> text not avai
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 04:17:37PM +0100, Jose' Matos spake thusly:
> Hi,
> as you know I am using the latest cvs version to test the back-converter.
>
> I have trouble with undo, almost all undos will lead to a crash.
>
> Now, after updating since last morning, so just with M
Hi,
as you know I am using the latest cvs version to test the back-converter.
I have trouble with undo, almost all undos will lead to a crash.
Now, after updating since last morning, so just with Martin's patch, I get
this, opening a file that I have been working on:
(gd
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 11:49:44AM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > How do I start lyxclient manually if I want to go to a certain line?
> >
> > lyxclient -g newfile16.lyx 13
> >
> > brings up a 'document is already loaded, w
Hello,
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> How do I start lyxclient manually if I want to go to a certain line?
>
> lyxclient -g newfile16.lyx 13
>
> brings up a 'document is already loaded, want to switch' dialog.
-g is an alias to LFUN_GOTOFILEROW. My inverse search patch just extend
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:57:55AM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:10:38PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Can this go in (as it is the polishing touch on the inset display
> > patch)?
>
> Yes.
>
> Andre'
It's in.
- Martin
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP si
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> How about this Jean-Marc?
Well the optional arguments to \author and \address seem to work as a
\label/\ref pair... I think this is a bit abusing the 'short title'
inset (and that people will get confused if they put strange things
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 11:41:41AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > What problem are you trying to solve that's not solvable by
>> > locally factoring out some common code from metrics() and draw()
>> > in a few fat insets?
>>
>> Have I answered this question with the above
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 11:45:45AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > The buttons present me with a choice of immediate crash or full
> > freeze. So it "sort of works", but not really automatic, nor
> > robust...
>
> Be fair, André.
I did not complain.
Andre'
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 11:41:41AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > What problem are you trying to solve that's not solvable by locally
> > factoring out some common code from metrics() and draw() in a few
> > fat insets?
>
> Have I answered this question with the above?
Sort of.
> I _really_ wou
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> The buttons present me with a choice of immediate crash or full freeze.
> So it "sort of works", but not really automatic, nor robust...
But there is also a bug in the core it seems...
The dialog appears because of a full path/only name problem. It doesn't if
the full path
How about this Jean-Marc?
diff -u -p -r1.8 elsart.layout
--- lib/layouts/elsart.layout 13 Oct 2003 09:50:09 - 1.8
+++ lib/layouts/elsart.layout 21 Oct 2003 10:50:21 -
@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ Style Author
ParSep0
Align Center
Alig
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> The buttons present me with a choice of immediate crash or full
> freeze. So it "sort of works", but not really automatic, nor
> robust...
Be fair, André. It's new code and I'm sure that its author would
welcome prescriptions to make it fail...
--
Angus
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:04:44AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> My main point is that the metrics and draw routines repeat large
>> blocks of code
>
> Only in a few cases in which we could have a local helper function
> which is called from both. Unless I miss the point c
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:11:06AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> >
> > I somehow lost track: Is this in?
>
> Yes.
>
> > If so, does it work with xdvi 22.40h (Stock SuSE 8.1)?
> > If so, how?
> > Andre'
>
> You need two things.
> 1. Either a latex compiler that understa
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:04:44AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> My main point is that the metrics and draw routines repeat large
> blocks of code
Only in a few cases in which we could have a local helper function which
is called from both. Unless I miss the point completely...
> and that my se
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 9:10 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> Ronald, what's going on here! Are you backporting João's stuff
> Angus> to the 1.3.x branch? If that is the case, I am 100% against
> Angus> this 'new release'.
>
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Ronald, what's going on here! Are you backporting João's stuff
Angus> to the 1.3.x branch? If that is the case, I am 100% against
Angus> this 'new release'.
Actually he is using the code against 1.3.x send a long time ago by
Joao.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> I somehow lost track: Is this in?
Yes.
> If so, does it work with xdvi 22.40h (Stock SuSE 8.1)?
> If so, how?
> Andre'
You need two things.
1. Either a latex compiler that understands the --src-specials flag or
the srcltx package. Here, my latex does not understand th
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I somehow lost track: Is this in?
Partially. There's a patch waiting for approval (support for sockets on qt
and shell variables fiddling). And you still have to define latex
--source-specials as your latex->dvi converter (if supported) or manually
\include[active]{srcltx.s
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 09:25:46AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> >> Is this just a wild flight of fancy, or does anybody else think
>> >> that it's a sensible proposal?
>> >
>> > I think this could be handled on a case-by-case base by using
>> > som
I somehow lost track: Is this in?
If so, does it work with xdvi 22.40h (Stock SuSE 8.1)?
If so, how?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:10:38PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Can this go in (as it is the polishing touch on the inset display
> patch)?
Yes.
Andre'
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 09:33:29AM +0300, Martin Vermeer spake thusly:
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:10:51PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
...
> I have experimentally placed display() =true in footnote/marginnote
> and floatinsets. I think eventually we want to make all collapsable
> ins
Angus Leeming wrote:
> std::ostream & operator<<(std::ostream & os, setFamily const & sf)
> {
> os.iword(CName::GetAlloc()) = sf.family_;
Ouch! That's
os.iword(setFamily::getAlloc()) = sf.family_;
> return os;
> }
>
> } // namespace font
>
>
--
Angus
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 09:25:46AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >> Is this just a wild flight of fancy, or does anybody else think
> >> that it's a sensible proposal?
> >
> > I think this could be handled on a case-by-case base by using some
> > helper functions in the inse
Ronald Florence wrote:
> I welcome beta testers for a new release of LyX/Mac. New features:
>
> - Inverse DVI search: if you use MacDviX with Preview -> DVI, you
> can Option-Click in the DVI window and have LyX jump to the
> corresponding point in the source file. The feature should
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> Is this just a wild flight of fancy, or does anybody else think
>> that it's a sensible proposal?
>
> I think this could be handled on a case-by-case base by using some
> helper functions in the insets that really need it.
Actually, I did some reading and I think I have st
> "Alain" == Alain Castera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alain> Hi All.
Alain> I apologize to bore you again, but I got no reaction to this
Alain> message. Should I file a bug under bugzilla ? Or is it a
Alain> temporary effect of using cvs version ?
Please file a bug. I am not able to look at
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> text2.C:153
Andre> // Realize with the fonts of lesser depth.
Andre> tmpfont.realize(outerFont(pit, ownerParagraphs()));
Andre> tmpfont.realize(defaultfont_);
Andre> text2.C:169
Andre> // Realize with the fonts of lesser depth.
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
>> btw, how should we introduce source-latex only for view->dvi? a
>> latexflavour?
>
> Your pet project surfaces again? Why not try and put a few thoughts
> down on e-paper about how it might be implemented and we can knock
> some ideas around.
text2.C:153
// Realize with the fonts of lesser depth.
tmpfont.realize(outerFont(pit, ownerParagraphs()));
tmpfont.realize(defaultfont_);
text2.C:169
// Realize with the fonts of lesser depth.
font.realize(outerFont(pit, ownerParagraphs()));
font.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:06:58PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I'm a bit pissed off with the way we handle fonts and strings.
Good starting point.
> It seems to me that we are duplicating code in the inset metrics and
> draw functions. Only in the very inner block of code do things
> differ, on
55 matches
Mail list logo
