On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 11:50:38PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Ah, I think I am beginning to see. Funny cursor behaviour when you're
> approaching the inset from below/above/left/right with the cursor
> keys, right?
I don't know off hand what effects it would have, only that there's a
problem
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 08:00:52PM +0100, John Levon spake thusly:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 09:10:18PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > > Can't work, .x and .y are not always set for INSET_EDIT. Basically it's
> > >
> > > You'd have to add some special hack for x == y == 0 everywhere.
> >
>
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 09:28:50PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >like "Branch: YourBranchName" instead.
>
> That would be easy to do, but adds (a little) clutter. What say the others on this?
You should add the label IMHO.
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice b
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 09:10:18PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Can't work, .x and .y are not always set for INSET_EDIT. Basically it's
> >
> > You'd have to add some special hack for x == y == 0 everywhere.
>
> That sounds downright fascinating. Some pointers?
Just grep for INSET_EDIT uses
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:48:20AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan spake thusly:
>
> Thanks, Martin. The patch works.
>
> I'm liking the "branches" idea. With lyx-xforms:
>
> 1) There should be more visual feedback. Right now a branch shows up with
>a generic "Label" inside a gray box. It should pro
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 01:35:45PM +0100, John Levon spake thusly:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 03:51:02PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > The attached patch does that. Just proof of principle.
>
> Can't work, .x and .y are not always set for INSET_EDIT. Basically it's
> used for two different
