Build fix for tex2lyx on Solaris

2003-07-26 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
The following make problem happens in Solaris. Seems that the version of /bin/sh does not like empty "for i in ... do ... done" constructs. Looking at the tex2lyx Makefile.am, it looks like the "graphics_linked_files" part is not necessary. Also, the solaris "ln" does not really work as expected w

[patch] remove support for autoconf 2.13

2003-07-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
This patch does this. Ok? ? src/frontends/xforms/lyx_forms.h ? src/frontends/xforms/lyx_xpm.h Index: .cvsignore === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -p -r1.8 .cvsignore --- .cvs

Re: [patch] buffer

2003-07-26 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 09:58:50PM +0200, Braunstein Alfredo wrote: > supposing it sucessfully finishes compiling, can I apply this? Too much beer ! > + string text = bformat(_("Could not open the specified " > + "document\n%1$s."), file); open >

Re: [patch] buffer

2003-07-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Braunstein Alfredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | supposing it sucessfully finishes compiling, can I apply this? yes. -- Lgb

Re: test

2003-07-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Braunstein Alfredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | test what are you testing? -- Lgb

[patch] buffer

2003-07-26 Thread Braunstein Alfredo
supposing it sucessfully finishes compiling, can I apply this? Index: buffer.C === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/buffer.C,v retrieving revision 1.496 diff -u -r1.496 buffer.C --- buffer.C25 Jul 2003 21:20:04 -

test

2003-07-26 Thread Braunstein Alfredo
test

Re: lyx-devel src/: BufferView.C BufferView.h BufferView_pimpl ...

2003-07-26 Thread Asger Kunuk Alstrup
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > What do you drink (or take) besides the bear? You do not want to know. > > You can try to rewrite that line manually > > I'll try tomorrow. You don't have to. I found the problem. It is not a compiler bug. Committing a fix later tonight. Best

Re: lyx-devel src/: BufferView.C BufferView.h BufferView_pimpl ...

2003-07-26 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Asger Kunuk Alstrup wrote: > See line 119 in undo_funcs.C. That's the line that > will crash. I tried upgrading the compiler, even started compiling gcc > from cvs to check, but unfortunately by accident totally unrelated to > the number of beers we had, the net effect was that glibc was hosed, > a

Re: lyx-devel src/: BufferView.C BufferView.h BufferView_pimpl ...

2003-07-26 Thread Asger Kunuk Alstrup
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > You are aware that these are still present? Note that they do not occur with > 1.3.3cvs. All of these crash if you do this in a document with only one paragrph. However, all of them work if you do in a document with more than one paragraph. I lo

Re: C++ debug patch fun

2003-07-26 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 05:28:15PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > For those unaware, the Apple guys have added "debug" versions of the STL > stuff to gcc (well it's still a patch currently). Loading examples/mathed.lyx This one looks very dodgy ! /usr/local/gcc-cvs/include/c++/3.4/debug/safe_iterat

C++ debug patch fun

2003-07-26 Thread John Levon
For those unaware, the Apple guys have added "debug" versions of the STL stuff to gcc (well it's still a patch currently). I think we're really going to have fun with this one. New file triggers an assertion, it's a bug just waiting to kill us it seems : /usr/local/gcc-cvs/include/c++/3.4/debug/

Re: lyx-devel src/: BufferView.C BufferView.h BufferView_pimpl ...

2003-07-26 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Undo cleaned up. It seems to work pretty well now. You are aware that these are still present? Note that they do not occur with 1.3.3cvs. Regards, Jürgen. Am Freitag, 18. Juli 2003 20:44 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller: > Always start with a new document... > > - Insert