On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 02:03:26PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Why is double-clicking sometimes so troublesome in Xforms?
> The File dialog has such trouble also. It's a bug in Xforms,
> or is the double-click feature wrongly coded in LyX ?
If you could fix the xforms file dialog, that'd be great.
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Rob Lahaye wrote:
>
>>The patch uses double-mouse-click for selecting a style in the
>>Xforms BibTeX dialog (instead of the instant selecting as it is now).
>
>
> Also seems like a good idea. Applied.
Angus and other Xforms gurus,
Why is double-clicking sometimes so trou
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 01:47:12AM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 02:25:22PM -0800, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
>
> > 2003-02-17 John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * config/configure.ac:
> > * config/configure.in: remove the -isystem fiddling. Let's see
> >
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(B
(B> Hm... I see. Then what can be your suggestion to resolve the problem,
(B> Miyata ? Remember that the environment setting in Angus machine should be
(B> quite standard with western locale.
(B
(BRestart xfs in a mode suitable for both CJK and non-CJK envir
Hello,
This is my preliminary patch for inverse (dvi) search in lyx. It relies on
latex to insert 'source specials', so latex must support the option
--src-specials. Also, xdvi must support 'source specials'. My versions
are:
tetex: 1.0.7+20011202
xdvi: 22.40f
Both support 'source special'.
Ho
I've been trying to update on two machines for several days now, with no
success. I've distcleaned, and even rm -r'd the src directory. Still
no luck. I've run autogen.sh and reconfigure. I've shed hair on my
keyboard.
Ultimately, I removed the entire directory and did a fresh checkout. It
c
Rob Lahaye wrote:
> The patch uses double-mouse-click for selecting a style in the
> Xforms BibTeX dialog (instead of the instant selecting as it is now).
Also seems like a good idea. Applied.
--
Angus
Rob Lahaye wrote:
> The attached patch fixes a bug in FormTexinfo.C.
>
> The reconstruction of the filepath was wrong, in case fullpath was
> not selected (the assumption that the order of the browser list
> is same for with and without full path, was wrong).
Seems reasonable. Applied.
--
Angus
Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I still had a patch to Xforms' RadioButtonGroup.[Ch] in my tree.
> It could not to go into CVS when 1.3.0 was in feature/code-freeze.
> Can it now?
It appears that it was applied on 16 Feb by JMarc...
--
Angus
Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Hello Kornel. I think you have to run autogen.sh to actually build the
>> Makefile correctly. There's some magic going on in the Qt Makefiles that
>> I'm not au fait with, but it worked for me thereafter.
>
> OK. But it still resists my compile-attempts.
> locate claims, th
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 12:47:35PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> I assume they are related because they both seem to happen during the
> "search" part of spell checking...
They may be related, but still not the same bug. So two minimal
testcases, please :)
john
John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 07:28:00PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
>
>> Hi, I use the new spell checking code from John in lyx-1.3.1CVS(qt3.11)
>> and I have some places in my document, where the spell checking process
>> is "stuck". It always jumps back to an earlier po
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
>> I've tried the previews in xforms and LyX becomes pretty slow when images
>> are loading. I've changed the LoaderQueue clock to come back every .5
>> secs intead of .1 secs, and to load 5 images at a time instead of 10. Is
>> the xforms graphi
Allan Rae wrote:
> A 20 second scan of the code in LoadQueue.C suggests that push_front()
> and pop_front() is the reason your queue is acting like a stack.
>
> Try pushing on one end and popping off the other.
Sorry Allan, I've tried to answer you by mail but with no luck. It is
supposed to wor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Freitag, 21. Februar 2003 21:16, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
> > On Freitag, 21. Februar 2003 19:26, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> Qt patch attached. I'll let you all examine at your leisure but would
> >> like to apply on Monday or so...
> >
> > No
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Shigeru Miyata wrote:
> I guess you are trying to scale a bitmap font. On my machine with
> Pentium 75MHz
> and 80MB RAM, it can take several minutes just to load a single Japanese
> font
> if it is a BDF and the requested size differ from the original one.
> Scaling a
> Tru
18 matches
Mail list logo