On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 10:39, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > On Friday 01 November 2002 10:14 am, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>When the ShowFile dialog is called from the LaTeX-Information
> >>dialog, the ShowFile dialog is transparent. Is there a draw()
> >>call missing som
On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 20:30, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:28:55PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
> > It feels like we're misunderstanding each other here... What can
> > you already do? Have latex start in the background, so that lyx doesn't
>
> add something to the too
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 03:44, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Darren Freeman wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > I just ran a spellcheck and noticed that when it hit 100% that it
> > actually has some garbage characters between 100 and %.
>
> Is that Qt or Xforms frontend?
Xforms
> If it's Xforms, I'm very much c
Hello,
Both LyX 1.2.1 and 1.3.0 report errors on trying View->DVI on the included
file. They seem to be a LyX bug.
Adrien Rebollo
--
#LyX 1.2 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 220
\textclass book
\language frenchb
\inputencoding latin1
\fontscheme default
\gra
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 04:32:14PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> André, I have a warning when compiling math_data.C. Wouldn't it be more
>> elegant/comprehensible to define a MathCursor::npos if you're saying that
>> the value is now invalid?
>
> Why not. Apply it if you w
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 05:44:01PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:28:49AM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
> > I encountered a bug of lyx1.3.0 cvs but could not repeat it. I then
> > submitted a bug report with the lyx file. Now, I find out what is wrong:
> >
> > 1. fire lyx1.3.0
>
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:28:49AM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
> I encountered a bug of lyx1.3.0 cvs but could not repeat it. I then
> submitted a bug report with the lyx file. Now, I find out what is wrong:
>
> 1. fire lyx1.3.0
> 2. enter displayed math and enter a greek symbol, say \mu
> 3. select th
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 04:32:14PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> André, I have a warning when compiling math_data.C. Wouldn't it be more
> elegant/comprehensible to define a MathCursor::npos if you're saying that
> the value is now invalid?
Why not. Apply it if you want (I am off now for the wee
Hi,
I encountered a bug of lyx1.3.0 cvs but could not repeat it. I then
submitted a bug report with the lyx file. Now, I find out what is wrong:
1. fire lyx1.3.0
2. enter displayed math and enter a greek symbol, say \mu
3. select this \mu and *convert it to text* by C-M (using sciword.bind)
4. c
André, I have a warning when compiling math_data.C. Wouldn't it be more
elegant/comprehensible to define a MathCursor::npos if you're saying that
the value is now invalid?
cxx: Warning: ../../../src/mathed/math_data.C, line 411: #68-D integer
conversion resulted in a change of sign
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:24:30PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> So people... are you ready for a small RTTI survy?
>>
>> compile this prog and run it:
>
| [[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ rpm -q gcc
| gcc-2.95.2-7cl
>
>
| [[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ g++ x
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:24:30PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> So people... are you ready for a small RTTI survy?
>
> compile this prog and run it:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ rpm -q gcc
gcc-2.95.2-7cl
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ g++ x.C
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ ./a.out
(nil)
0x8049f80
(nil)
0
On Friday 01 November 2002 11:17 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Shouldn't
>
> vector const getBBUnits()
> {
> return vector(bb_units, bb_units + bb_size);
> }
>
> work as well?
>
> Andre'
Thank you.
A
Shouldn't
vector const getBBUnits()
{
return vector(bb_units, bb_units + bb_size);
}
work as well?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Angus Leeming wrote:
On Friday 01 November 2002 10:39 am, Rob Lahaye wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
On Friday 01 November 2002 10:14 am, Rob Lahaye wrote:
Hi,
When the ShowFile dialog is called from the
LaTeX-Information dialog, the ShowFile dialog is
transparent. Is there a draw() call missin
For me it is o. k.
--
Regards, Hartmut
Hungerhilfe: http://www.thehungersite.com
ATTAC - für eine solidarische weltwirtschaft
gegen neoliberale globalisierung: http://www.attac-netzwerk.de
Mitmachen bei der GATS-Kampagne: http://www.attac-netzwerk.de/gats/
www
For me it is o. k.
--
Regards, Hartmut
Hungerhilfe: http://www.thehungersite.com
ATTAC - für eine solidarische weltwirtschaft
gegen neoliberale globalisierung: http://www.attac-netzwerk.de
Mitmachen bei der GATS-Kampagne: http://www.attac-netzwerk.de/gats/
www
On Friday 01 November 2002 10:47 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | As "data" is a static variable, shouldn't this function
> | return a reference?
>
> I'd rather remove the static.
>
> It makes the funciton non-reentrant for no good reason.
> And if it n
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 11:47:00AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> And if it needs to cache anything is should be done as a class
> variable not as a static var inside a member function.
I wonder a bit why you suddenly want to make things more visible than
they need to be. This does not look l
On Friday 01 November 2002 10:39 am, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > On Friday 01 November 2002 10:14 am, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>When the ShowFile dialog is called from the
> >> LaTeX-Information dialog, the ShowFile dialog is
> >> transparent. Is there a draw() call missin
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| As "data" is a static variable, shouldn't this function return a
| reference?
I'd rather remove the static.
It makes the funciton non-reentrant for no good reason.
And if it needs to cache anything is should be done as a class
variable not as a static
Angus Leeming wrote:
On Friday 01 November 2002 10:14 am, Rob Lahaye wrote:
Hi,
When the ShowFile dialog is called from the LaTeX-Information
dialog, the ShowFile dialog is transparent. Is there a draw()
call missing somewhere, or something like that?
Am I the only one seeing this? To see it,
On Friday 01 November 2002 10:14 am, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When the ShowFile dialog is called from the LaTeX-Information
> dialog, the ShowFile dialog is transparent. Is there a draw()
> call missing somewhere, or something like that?
>
> Am I the only one seeing this? To see it, do "View->Te
Hi,
When the ShowFile dialog is called from the LaTeX-Information dialog,
the ShowFile dialog is transparent. Is there a draw() call missing
somewhere, or something like that?
Am I the only one seeing this? To see it, do "View->TeX information",
then double click on one the the lines in the brow
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 09:59:51AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> As "data" is a static variable, shouldn't this function return a
> reference?
It would work at least.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Je
As "data" is a static variable, shouldn't this function return a
reference?
Angus
vector const ControlGraphics::getUnits()
{
static vector data;
if (!data.empty())
return data;
data.resize(bb_size);
for (lyx::size_type i = 0; i < bb_size; ++i) {
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 10:52:07PM -0500, Uwe Hartl wrote:
> At least somebody could tell me where to begin looking for the
> structures so I can begin to create a file which Maxima can process. Not
> only simplifying a equation, better making the document "alive".
Dekel put in basic Maxima suppor
27 matches
Mail list logo
