On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:45:31PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Recently there was a backtrace reported. The crash would not occur if the
> | following is appplied. This does not cure the (still unknown) problem,
> | though.
>
> If you want it in, commit it, else dig for the real problem
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:55:40PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i am working with linux kde on windows xp via exceed hummingbird/putty
> (ssh). my problem is an unstability of running lyx. with the help of some
> tricks
> it is running, sometimes stable.
Do you have an idea regarding the cau
Allan Rae wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Garst R. Reese wrote:
>
> So you should really allow "," and "-" in the From field so we
> can once again write:
> 35,45,47,50-59,65,66
>
> And if either of those characters appears in the from field the to
> field should be be disabled (maybe... IIRC
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Rob Lahaye wrote:
[...]
> > Related GUI/Coding issues:
> >
> > - Should comma input be permitted ONLY for From field,
> > and not for To field? In other words should we disable following:
> >from 43 to 56,73 ?
> >
> > - And if so, disabl
Garst R. Reese wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
>
>
>>No. There is no reason to fix this, unless and iff "Tab" does not move
>>from the From box to the To box.
>>
>
> How is that relevant? Are you saying that if enter 79 in From, then Tab
> and enter 153 in To, I will only print pages 79 and 153? Th
Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Rob Lahaye wrote:
>
>>
>>Could you please be more specific how to use this comma input? Should a comma
>>be allowed only in the 'from' input?
>>Could you give me some examples of valid 'comma-input'?
>
>
> Alice's example was From 79,153
Which means? Only 79 and 153? Or
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 09:40:55AM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Could you please be more specific how to use this comma input? Should a
> comma
> be allowed only in the 'from' input? Could you give me some examples of
> valid 'comma-input'?
No. There is no reason to fix this, unless and iff "Tab"
Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Alice says that on the Print dialogue she used to be able to enter page
> numbers separated by commas to print selected pages. She just noticed
> that this feature no longer works. Don't know when it went missing. It
> was often more convenient than using gv.
Garst,
I
I have one last modification in QSendto.C:
bool QSendto::isValid()
{
int const line(dialog_->formatLB->currentItem());
if (line < 0 || line > dialog_->formatLB->count())
return false;
else return dialog_->formatLB->count() != 0 &&
!string(
> You do now.
> You have now access to all of frontends.
Thanks, I'll check it in then...
> the qt dir is pretty much open development, but focus should not be on
> streamlining, but on getting all the basic funcitonality in.
I think we all agree on that...
Regards, Ed.
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:43:09PM +0930, Darren Freeman wrote:
>> I was working on a document, with the user guide open as the second
>> document.
>>
>> When adding cross references to my document, the list of choices were from
>> the user guide. After
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is it in a working state?
>
| As I said most of it is sort of ok-ish
>
| bullets don't work
| buffer isn't updated yet
>
>> Should it then be committed at once?
>> (why not?)
>
| why not indeed, it allows others to tinker with it too, could you or someo
... and then I realized you switched to xforms-1.0,
so I've made a new package on RH8:
lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms10.i386.rpm
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 12:53:27PM +0200, I Wayan Warmada wrote:
>
> Dear LyX-users,
> I have a problem with the list of figures in LyX-1.3.0cvs. The long title
> of the figures is not wrapped correctly (over the page boundary). Could
> you please explain me how to solve the problem?
It is usual
On Tuesday 08 October 2002 5:09 pm, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:43:09PM +0930, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > I was working on a document, with the user guide open as the
> > second document.
> >
> > When adding cross references to my document, the list of
> > choices were from the u
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:43:09PM +0930, Darren Freeman wrote:
> I was working on a document, with the user guide open as the second
> document.
>
> When adding cross references to my document, the list of choices were from
> the user guide. After a while I realised you can click on "buffer" t
> Is it in a working state?
As I said most of it is sort of ok-ish
bullets don't work
buffer isn't updated yet
> Should it then be committed at once?
> (why not?)
why not indeed, it allows others to tinker with it too, could you or someone
else see to it? I don't know whether I still have cvs
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:15:07AM -0400, William Morgan wrote:
> I've been trying to compile the gnome frontend system under a RedHat 7.1
> box at work, and I have the following problem while running configure:
I don't thing anything but xforms and qt2 frontends will work.
Andre'
--
Those who
Hi everyone,
I've been trying to compile the gnome frontend system under a RedHat 7.1
box at work, and I have the following problem while running configure:
(from config.log)
configure:10183: g++ -o conftest -O -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions
-I/usr/lib/gtkmm/include -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/incl
John Levon wrote:
> > This doesn't seem to do anything either way, so why special case
> > readOnly()?
>
> Oh right. Well it can be removed altogether ...
Yes, it was just silly logic (this signal and slot stuff is not yet very clear
to me and I have just copied stuff from citation and ref).
Th
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> | Lars, can I apply it?
>
| Lars> Yes, if you test it a bit.
>
| I did all the simple tests I could think of. But obviously a while
| loop without incrementation of the vari
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:20:42PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> This doesn't seem to do anything either way, so why special case
> readOnly()?
Oh right. Well it can be removed altogether ...
regards
john
--
"I will eat a rubber tire to the music of The Flight of the Bumblebee"
On Tuesday 08 October 2002 3:08 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:04:55PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > This seems designed to confuse. What are you planning to do
> > with it? Perhaps a comment for the rest of us...
>
> This comment has confused me. Have we decided to change ou
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:04:55PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> This seems designed to confuse. What are you planning to do with
> it? Perhaps a comment for the rest of us...
This comment has confused me. Have we decided to change our minds about
send to /again/ ?
> Has anyoone mentioned that
On Tuesday 08 October 2002 1:56 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Believe it or not: it works.
> Please review and apply, if there are no objections.
This seems designed to confuse. What are you planning to do with
it? Perhaps a comment for the rest of us...
void QSendtoDialog::slotFormatHighli
On Tuesday 08 October 2002 2:55 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 02:54:29PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > In this particular case you are being too hard on Qt. The
> > problem is apparent with the xforms frontend also and is,
> > therefore, probably my fault.
>
> It's the classic
hallo!
i am working with linux kde on windows xp via exceed hummingbird/putty
(ssh). my problem is an unstability of running lyx. with the help of some
tricks
it is running, sometimes stable. but: is there a really convenient solution
for this problem?
thanx for help
jan
--
+++ GMX - Mail,
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 02:54:29PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> In this particular case you are being too hard on Qt. The
> problem is apparent with the xforms frontend also and is,
> therefore, probably my fault.
It's the classic error message from Qt's #define signals,
or maye I misread it.
On Tuesday 08 October 2002 2:42 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 10:50:43AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller
wrote:
> > Thanks, Angus, changing the order did indeed solve this
> > problem. Now I am one
>
> Welcome to the wonderful world of Qt.
>
> Its headers pollute the namespaces with
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:44:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Should it then be committed at once?
> (why not?)
I agree, if the source is clean, commit it. We can then work on the
remaining bits, I may even find time to help out with some of it.
That's what I did for the math dialog an
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:43:22PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i noticed two bugs in lyx:
What version of LyX is that?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> | Lars, can I apply it?
Lars> Yes, if you test it a bit.
I did all the simple tests I could think of. But obviously a while
loop without incrementation of the variable cannot be right :)
JMarc
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Recently there was a backtrace reported. The crash would not occur if the
| following is appplied. This does not cure the (still unknown) problem,
| though.
If you want it in, commit it, else dig for the real problem and fix
that instead. Your choice.
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| No it's not finished yet but for those wanting to know where it's heading a
| patch...
Is it in a working state?
Should it then be committed at once?
(why not?)
--
Lgb
hallo!
i noticed two bugs in lyx:
if i open a bigger lyx-document like a help topic (eg. introduction or
customization) and i want to scroll a little bit faster, lyx is mostly crashing.
(gdb-report and backtrace: lyx-bug-backtrace.txt)
another one happens only sometimes: a copy/paste action usi
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Andre> s s
>
| Andre> No time to look into it.
>
| Note that this is also bug #652, reported also last week.
>
| I think the attached patch shows clearly what was wrong :) I have
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 10:50:43AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Thanks, Angus, changing the order did indeed solve this problem. Now I am one
Welcome to the wonderful world of Qt.
Its headers pollute the namespaces with defines, so you have to be very
careful about how you order header
Believe it or not: it works.
Please review and apply, if there are no objections.
Thanks,
Jürgen.
QSendto.tar.gz
Description: application/tgz
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 12:16:31PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> PS: For heresy's sake: I think the 1.2 series is in an acceptable shape for
> most users.
It is indeed a heresy. There is so much horribly wrong with 1.2 I
wouldn't know where to start.
> So I see no _real_ need for 1.3 (anymore).
Recently there was a backtrace reported. The crash would not occur if the
following is appplied. This does not cure the (still unknown) problem,
though.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Ind
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 10:58:31AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | I think we need some automatism to solve the dead-lock issue. Like "if pre1
> | is not out after a four week freeze, the freeze is revoked"...
>
> Yes, but in what way does that help?
We could go back to infrastructure work
Angus Leeming wrote:
> I have seen this before and don't understand what causes it.
> However, it appears that the order of the includes in QSendto.C
> is important.
Thanks, Angus, changing the order did indeed solve this problem. Now I am one
step further and can continue debugging (of course b
No it's not finished yet but for those wanting to know where it's heading a
patch...
It is at a point where it can be used to save stuff, sort of.
Some of the stuff that needs tinkering:
The view isn't updated yet after choosing a new document class (closing and
reopening is needed) haven't f
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> s s
Andre> No time to look into it.
Note that this is also bug #652, reported also last week.
I think the attached patch shows clearly what was wrong :) I have a
similar one for 1.2.x.
Lars, can I apply it?
JMarc
Index
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I agree. But the objective is not to cram as many features as
Lars> possible into the next release, but to get the next release out
Lars> of the door. The best would be for all of us to look at what
Lars> needs to be done and h
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, John Levon wrote:
| [...]
>> iirc the problem was that that code doesn't have a good idea of where
>> one title ends and the other begins. At least, that was the problem I
>> hit when trying to fix the menus to behave in a bearable manne
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I think we need some automatism to solve the dead-lock issue. Like "if pre1
| is not out after a four week freeze, the freeze is revoked"...
Yes, but in what way does that help?
Let's say that we are in review state instead: No patches go into cvs
unl
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, John Levon wrote:
[...]
> iirc the problem was that that code doesn't have a good idea of where
> one title ends and the other begins. At least, that was the problem I
> hit when trying to fix the menus to behave in a bearable manner.
Whatever became of the experimental menu c
> "michael" == michael schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
michael> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb
michael> am 08.10.2002, 11:35:28:
>> As far as I know, there are not many things that are easy enough to
>> backport. Do you have something in mind?
michael> I don't know exa
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am
08.10.2002, 11:35:28:
> As far as I know, there are not many things that are easy enough to
> backport. Do you have something in mind?
I don't know exactly as I have not followed the 1.3.0 development in all
its details. How about the problem w
On Tuesday 08 October 2002 8:29 am, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> John | Edwin,
>
> I have tried to implement QSendto, but it does not build. I
> have tried to catch the failure, but I had no success. Would
> be great if one of you could have a look. The error log is
> below, the files (work in pr
John | Edwin,
I have tried to implement QSendto, but it does not build. I have tried to
catch the failure, but I had no success. Would be great if one of you could
have a look. The error log is below, the files (work in progress) are
attached.
Sorry if the error is obvious.
Many thanks,
Jürge
52 matches
Mail list logo
