Re: 2.96 and boost::signals [investigation]

2002-06-06 Thread Allan Rae
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> | Despite that, it seems to be more and more necessary for LyX > >> | developers _and users_ to be using gcc-cvs rather than > >> | gcc-some-recent-release if they want to compile LyX! > >> > >> Bullshit

Re: rpm.README

2002-06-06 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 11:25:28AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Kayvan" == Kayvan A Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Kayvan> Lars or Jean-Marc, Can you update the attached on the LyX > Kayvan> sites? > > Done. > > JMarc Great. Thanks. -- Kayvan A. Sylvan Sylvan Associate

Re: rework of xforms configuration stuff

2002-06-06 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:56:28PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > People, I have rewritten most of xforms.m4 in the 1.2.1cvs branch. Well I tried to warn you ... It's broken for me because you don't include lib jpeg in the libs when testing flimage, so the link fails. Obviously you can't

cxx 6.5 warnings...

2002-06-06 Thread Angus Leeming
Woo hoo! I have a decent compiler again! As for the warnings, there are thousands of em, especially in the boost code! there are also some errors about stuff that's now in namespace std, but that's by the by. However, these two warnings might prove important given the recent angst with boost:

rework of xforms configuration stuff

2002-06-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
People, I have rewritten most of xforms.m4 in the 1.2.1cvs branch. This new version is simpler and should work better than what we had. Yes, I know that it changes config.h and you will have to recompile everything (I suspect it is not the last time). I am sure there are bugs in this code, but I

Re: Questions about the character dialog

2002-06-06 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:45:00PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | If we're being prescriptive, we can insist the user make a named style > | before they can use it. > > > | I don't know how hard the core changes to do this would be. > > Pretty hard... if not I would have done it years ag

Re: Questions about the character dialog

2002-06-06 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:52:01PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > >> Confusing? > | YEs ! > | Here's what the qt2 version looks like currently : > | http://movementarian.org/character.png > >> Good. Then you can have a go at defining what and how this dialog >

Developer's meeting & GUII

2002-06-06 Thread John Levon
Some people have mentioned they're planning to do some GUII work at the meeting.. I had hoped to get some of the core changes from my GUII branch in before the meeting but Lars' obstructionism has prevented that, so instead I'll just make a couple of comments about BRANCH_GUII 1. Please cherry-

Re: Questions about the character dialog

2002-06-06 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:52:01PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > Confusing? YEs ! Here's what the qt2 version looks like currently : http://movementarian.org/character.png > Good. Then you can have a go at defining what and how this dialog > does. Even better, perhaps you can make user-definabl

Re: [PATCH] epsi- graphic files

2002-06-06 Thread Herbert Voss
R. Lahaye wrote: > Herbert Voss wrote: > >>ok, than there is no problem. >>try this one which was not created by convert >> >> > > $ convert EPSI:pendula.epsi XPM:pendula.xpm > convert: Unable to open file (./magicNfnbSg) [No such file or directory]. > convert: Missing an image file name. > $ >

URL inset and LaTeX

2002-06-06 Thread John Levon
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449 JMarc mentions the LaTeX gurus suggest switching to a different LaTeX package ... should we do this ? regards john -- "Do you mean to tell me that "The Prince" is not the set textbook for CS1072 Professional Issues ? What on earth do you learn in th

Re: [PATCH] epsi- graphic files

2002-06-06 Thread Herbert Voss
R. Lahaye wrote: > Herbert Voss writes: > >>Does somebody knows why >> >>convert file.epsi file >> >>fails?? >> > > $ convert EPSI:graph.epsi XPM:graph.xpm > > works alright here, also without the "EPSI:" and "XPM:" prefixes. > > I have "ImageMagick 5.4.5 05/01/02 Q:16" hm, I have the s

RE: [PATCH] epsi- graphic files

2002-06-06 Thread R. Lahaye
Herbert Voss writes: > > Does somebody knows why > > convert file.epsi file > > fails?? $ convert EPSI:graph.epsi XPM:graph.xpm works alright here, also without the "EPSI:" and "XPM:" prefixes. I have "ImageMagick 5.4.5 05/01/02 Q:16" Rob.

Re: 2.96 and boost::signals [investigation]

2002-06-06 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> | Despite that, it seems to be more and more necessary for LyX >> | developers _and users_ to be using gcc-cvs rather than >> | gcc-some-recent-release if they want to compile LyX! >> >> Bullshit! >> >> Please try to backup that claim. > | You said yoursel

Re: rpm.README

2002-06-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Kayvan" == Kayvan A Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kayvan> Lars or Jean-Marc, Can you update the attached on the LyX Kayvan> sites? Done. JMarc

Re: Rotate eps in 1.2.0

2002-06-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> On Wednesday 05 June 2002 4:26 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Angus, does it mean that yo are going to commit this? Or do I have >> to do it? Angus> I've done it. Both to the trunk and to the 1_2_X branch. A Thanks. JMarc

Re: Rotate eps in 1.2.0

2002-06-06 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 05 June 2002 4:26 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus, does it mean that yo are going to commit this? Or do I have to > do it? I've done it. Both to the trunk and to the 1_2_X branch. A