On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 07:00:47PM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> Here's the same for gcc-3.0.4. Very similar error messages. Any ideas?
> No, it's not a faulty installation.
Garst, can you still build with gcc 3 ?
john
--
"here's a joke for you: why did the chicken turn around and around i
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 09:08:43PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Trying to link on Cygnus with gcc-3.2cvs, I get the following errors
> | on link:
>
> Why not do this with gcc-3.1. 3.2 is not something that we care about
> at all at this
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:54:59PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > If this is such a big issue why didn't you do this patch 6 months or a
> > year ago ?
>
> I wasn't aware of the problem
You really managed to miss all the extra par stuff getting removed ??
> didn't have time.
well ... it's not m
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 08:52:14PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:49:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > The patch to UPGRADING:
> >
> > ... LyX 1.2.0 does not handle correctly older files. After the upgrade,
> > you will need to spend several hours to manually fix your fi
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:49:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> The patch to UPGRADING:
>
> ... LyX 1.2.0 does not handle correctly older files. After the upgrade,
> you will need to spend several hours to manually fix your files.
> But LyX 1.2.0 is so wonderful, so it is worth your time!
Oh come
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 08:28:18PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:23:45PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > If you had a floatingfigure in a 1.1.6 file, lyx-1.2.0 will read is as
> > a standard figure. Therefore, the DVI output will be wrong.
>
> This is not my definition of
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:23:45PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> If you had a floatingfigure in a 1.1.6 file, lyx-1.2.0 will read is as
> a standard figure. Therefore, the DVI output will be wrong.
This is not my definition of "very bad" to be honest. I think a patch
to UPGRADING would be much bet
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 08:18:01PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:14:08PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > Currently, lyx-1.2.0 doesn't read correctly 1.1.6 files which is very bad.
>
> Is it ? What's wrong exactly ?
If you had a floatingfigure in a 1.1.6 file, lyx-1.2.0 wi
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:14:08PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Currently, lyx-1.2.0 doesn't read correctly 1.1.6 files which is very bad.
Is it ? What's wrong exactly ?
Don't we want 1.2.0 to come out ??
john
--
"Taste is predicated on discrimination."
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 09:09:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Here is a patch :)
> | Can I apply it ?
>
> No.
Why?
Currently, lyx-1.2.0 doesn't read correctly 1.1.6 files which is very bad.
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 12:44:34PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >
>> | Why we don't have a floatingfigure inset ?
>>
>> Because you have not created one.
>
| Here is a patch :)
| Can I apply it ?
No.
--
Lgb
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Trying to link on Cygnus with gcc-3.2cvs, I get the following errors
| on link:
Why not do this with gcc-3.1. 3.2 is not something that we care about
at all at this stage... it will be released in ~decemeber... 3.1. will
be released ~15th of may.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 12:44:34PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >
> | Why we don't have a floatingfigure inset ?
>
> Because you have not created one.
Here is a patch :)
Can I apply it ?
PS: Is InsetFloating a good name ?
patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Hi,
The REVTeX4 layout deals wrongly with the display on the LyX canvas
of the PACS numbers (the final output is okay though!).
The PACS numbers usually follows after the abstract, and follow the
abstract's left-alignment. However, the PACS numbers now align with
the main document text and actu
peaceangus[1].htm
Description: Binary data
** Message from InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT **
** WARNING! Attached file Web.pif contains:
WORM_KLEZ.G virus
Attempted to clean the file but it is not cleanable.
It has been deleted.
* End of message *
Hi,
I don't see the point of having a View->EPS option.
View->Postscript is doing a perfect job here, isn't it?
However, if we keep the View->EPS, we need to provide
a PS-to-EPS converter, otherwise LyX creates a bad quality
EPS by:
1) create Postscript
2) convert PS to XPM
3) convert XPM
16 matches
Mail list logo
