Dekel Tsur wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 04:36:46PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>>any comments?
>>
>
>What about setting package options ?
>
good idea!
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:56:56AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Jules" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jules> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:43:43AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> >> P.S.: I REALLY get your mail from lyx-devel you don't have to Cc:
> >> me all mail separat
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 02:08:07AM -0500, Matej Cepl wrote:
> I have again been urged to use vim for editing some
> document on my archaic notebook (where I use M$-DOS and vim) and
> I was against unpleasantly surprised, that LyX still does not
> provide interoperability between LyX and LaTeX in
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 12:20:58PM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> 1) r
> 2) L
> 3) G
>
> Since usually I only reply to one person, when not in
> mailing-list-mode, this satisfy the principle of the least surprise.
>
> So I must say that I want to reply to the mailing list,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:07:26AM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> Better yet, educate people to behave politely.
>
> I will I increase the message size and thus make the net slower
> because some people don't know how to use their MUA?
>
> (this is an appropriate friday post
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 04:33:39PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> I can reproduce this with xforms-0.88.1, linux-2.2.19, XFree86-4.0.3.
> I also noticed an X-windows(?) warning message printed for every case
THere are people who would murder you for calling it "X-windows" !
> below:
> BadMatch
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 04:36:46PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> any comments?
What about setting package options ?
any comments?
Herbert
On 16-Nov-2001 Jules Bean wrote:
> Most mailers interpret it so that 'Reply' still goes to the From
> address (or Reply-To:, if set), whilst the function 'Follow-up' or
> 'Group-Reply' goes to the Mail-Followup-To: address.
>
> In other words, private replies go privately, public replies go to
> "Michael" == Michael A Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> This is the last patch I'll be able to contribute till late
Michael> next week some time. Hopefully there's nothing that can
Michael> prevent it being applied.
A few comments/ideas (although I think this patch is definit
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 01:04:19PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 16-Nov-2001 Jules Bean wrote:
>
> > So configure your mailer to add the following header:
> >
> > Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ...and (more) people won't.
>
> I'm not so expert in this does this mean that I t
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 12:53:14PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What are those measures? Do you still answer to people who are not
> subscribed to the list?
In that case it is necessary to do a group reply, so that it replies
to the sender and the other people present in the other fiel
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 01:04:19PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> I'm not so expert in this does this mean that I then get all my private
> messages answered to lyx-devel, when doing a reply!?
Would be fun, wouldn't it?
Andre'
PS: This serves as a test...
--
André Pönitz ..
On 16-Nov-2001 Jules Bean wrote:
> So configure your mailer to add the following header:
>
> Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ...and (more) people won't.
I'm not so expert in this does this mean that I then get all my private
messages answered to lyx-devel, when doing a reply!?
On 16-Nov-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> The doubled mails are mainly because the list is in the cc: and I am
> answering juergen. Of course, I manually could put in the list in the To:
> and remove the Cc:, but that's a pai.
Well that's what I do every time!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-.
> "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose> Once you set that, you reply with L and mutt knows that you
Jose> are replying to a mailing list so it takes the necessary
Jose> measures.
What are those measures? Do you still answer to people who are not
subscribed
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 12:33:29PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:07:26AM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> >
> > Better yet, educate people to behave politely.
>
> So please tell me how to setup mutt politely.
in .muttrc add
subscribe lyx-
This will
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:07:26AM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> Better yet, educate people to behave politely.
So please tell me how to setup mutt politely.
The doubled mails are mainly because the list is in the cc: and I am
answering juergen. Of course, I manually could pu
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:03:12AM +, Jules Bean wrote:
>
> Well, it seems so ;-) Your message does include this header.
It should since I told mutt that this is a mailling list.
BTW, you should know that no emoticons are allowed on fridays, or
else my previous message would be full of
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Allan> This looks okay compared to running LyX on screen :0.0 at the
Allan> same breakpoint. Any ideas what else might be worth looking at
Allan> in the Display struct? Take a look at Xlib.h for the
Allan> definition.
I read a bit the xforms
> "Jules" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jules> More to the point, there is no consensus on polite behaviour:
Jules> I, for one, find it polite when people *do* CC me on mailing
Jules> list postings. I read my personal mail more frequently than the
Jules> mailing list.
Actually, I
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:07:26AM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:46:46AM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> >
> > Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Better yet, educate people to behave politely.
>
> I will I increase the message size and thus make the
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> If people agree (I didn't still get agreement from at least
Juergen> Lars and Jean-Marc!)
I have to admit that I do not understand much about this inset locking
stuff (I which I would, but...). So all I can do is a vote to ex
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:46:46AM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:43:43AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > P.S.: I REALLY get your mail from lyx-devel you don't have to Cc: me all mail
> > separately.
>
> So configure your mailer to add the following header:
>
> Mail-
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> The attached patch intoduces a new LFUN (LFUN_MATH "math").
No it does not. There is no patch.
And you fogot to add math_replace.* in your latest commit, methink.
JMarc
> "Jules" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jules> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:43:43AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> P.S.: I REALLY get your mail from lyx-devel you don't have to Cc:
>> me all mail separately.
Jules> So configure your mailer to add the following header:
Jules> Mail-
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:43:43AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> P.S.: I REALLY get your mail from lyx-devel you don't have to Cc: me all mail
> separately.
So configure your mailer to add the following header:
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...and (more) people won't.
Jules
On 16-Nov-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:12:34AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> If people agree (I didn't still get agreement from at least Lars and
>> Jean-Marc!) we should change the call to bv->unlockInset() to
>> bv->unlockInset(HOW), then the above should work if you
The attached patch intoduces a new LFUN (LFUN_MATH "math").
It does not do anything yet, but I want to move over all the other
LFUN_MATH_* stuff and do my own dispatch.
We have had the discussion already a few times...
Main Pros:
- I do not have to go through the usual two-hours-or-maybe-tw
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:12:34AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> If people agree (I didn't still get agreement from at least Lars and
> Jean-Marc!) we should change the call to bv->unlockInset() to
> bv->unlockInset(HOW), then the above should work if you call
> bv->unlockInset(CURSOR_AFTER) (or a
On 16-Nov-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> calling bv->unlockInset() and returning "UNDISPATCHED" inserts a space _in
> front_ of the formula (and correctly so).
>
> What was the trick again to get the space behind the formula?
If people agree (I didn't still get agreement from at least Lars and
Hello Computer User,
I appreciate that your time is very valuable, so I will be brief, to save
money on your printer consumables, visit www.inkonline.co.uk
Many thanks,
Inkonline.
A short message regarding our emails...
Your email address has been passed to us as a user interested in purchas
calling bv->unlockInset() and returning "UNDISPATCHED" inserts a space _in
front_ of the formula (and correctly so).
What was the trick again to get the space behind the formula?
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
33 matches
Mail list logo
