Re: More chess stuff

2001-11-04 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 06:49:35PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > it should be better not to change the name of the style-file. There was no change to the name of the style file. > if you did some changes, than put these ones into the prample > part of the layout file. Yes, they are there. > I c

Re: More chess stuff

2001-11-04 Thread Herbert Voss
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > [ First, does anyone else care about this chess stuff? ;-) ] > > I have a new layout file for chess articles and an additional > example file (this time not using the external inset). > > Can someone add this new layout and put the attached chess-

Re: [PATCH] floatlist GUI support

2001-11-04 Thread John Levon
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 06:42:48PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > with the newfloat feature this should be written new. er, what happened to the feature freeze ? regards john -- "All this just amounts to more grist for the mill of the ill." - Elizabeth Wurtzel

Re: [PATCH] floatlist GUI support

2001-11-04 Thread Herbert Voss
John Levon wrote: > > minimal, so not ideal. But I think it will do ! > > >floatlistgui.diffName: floatlistgui.diff with the newfloat feature this should be written new. HErbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/

Re: (new)float dialog

2001-11-04 Thread Herbert Voss
> here's the patch with some new files. > a lot of changes ... so expect bugs > it's against cvs from this afternoon and also tested. forgot to say, that you can use the layout style float. put the following file into ~/.lyx/layout and insert a "Input float.inc" in your article.layout or any othe

Re: (new)float dialog

2001-11-04 Thread Herbert Voss
"Garst R. Reese" wrote: > > Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > > > > > Herbert Voss wrote: > > > > > I've updated the (new)float dialog: > Which tree is this in? I like it but can't find it (;< > 1.2.0CVS here's the patch with some new files. a lot of changes ... so expect bugs it's against cvs fr

Re: [PATCH] oddments

2001-11-04 Thread John Levon
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 01:11:55PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Why remove the debug info? it's a pain in the butt and it gets in the way. I also can't remember the last time they were /useful/ and I've done a fair bit of event-debugging. Or can we have Debug::NOONEEVERWANTSTOSEETHESE :P

Out of topic: Interview with...

2001-11-04 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
Hi, I have seen this interview with some unknown guy. Guess who? ;-) http://kerneltrap.com/article.php?sid=360 :-) -- José

Re: make.log CVS

2001-11-04 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 09:24:20PM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote: > No luck. I commented out > os << "" << getContents() << > ""; > to get a compilation. Ok, I will look to that tomorrow. Time to rest. Also FWIW I don't see that bug, using gcc 2.96-89. I never did, that was the reason