> 1.1.6fix3:
> in an equnarray you can delete the lower right cell.
> the formula than looks like
>
> \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray*}
> 11 & 21 & 31\\
> 21 & 22 & 23\\
> 31 & 32 <- missing cell!
> \end{eqnarray*}
>
> \end_inset
>
> in 1.1.6 this doesn't matter, the lyxfile i
Insert a 9 x 9 cm .eps file in a figure float.
The red box extends off the right side of the screen.
The .eps figure is not centred and does not have a consistent placing.
A short caption is centred on the page.
A long caption starts at the left edge of figure (OK)
All of this is true with both Ol
1.1.6fix3:
in an equnarray you can delete the lower right cell.
the formula than looks like
\begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray*}
11 & 21 & 31\\
21 & 22 & 23\\
31 & 32 <- missing cell!
\end{eqnarray*}
\end_inset
in 1.1.6 this doesn't matter, the lyxfile is always
read well.
readi
> Here's the formula. Note the \right) at the end.
Fixed. Stupid thinko of mine.
Andre'
PS: You do not need to send screenshot unless I really can't reproduce the
problem.
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello!
I'm using LyX 1.1.6fix2b.
I would like to contribute the Russian koi8-r keymap with Microsoft
layout and also inform you about some bugs.
1. Is is impossible to set displaysize with 'math-size displaysize' to
each row of array in the equation. Even after manual edit of the
LyX file
Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> Loading up a document with current cvs I noticed the current display problem.
>
> Here's the formula. Note the \right) at the end.
>
> \begin_inset Formula \begin{equation}
> \frac{\partial C}{\partial t}=-u\frac{\partial C}{\partial
> x}+\frac{D}{A}\frac{\partial }{\pa
Loading up a document with current cvs I noticed the current display problem.
Here's the formula. Note the \right) at the end.
\begin_inset Formula \begin{equation}
\frac{\partial C}{\partial t}=-u\frac{\partial C}{\partial
x}+\frac{D}{A}\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\left(a\frac{\partial C}{\par
On 14-Aug-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 02:37:43PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> > But spellchecking is much faster!
>> > I believe that they have similar implementation so why there is a
>> > difference ?
>>
>> One does activate nodraw() the other doesn't (and it's not possi
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 02:25:34PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> >> Well, the answer is that the search&replace code should use the iterators I
> >> wrote.
> >> In the current implementation of search&replace, you see the cursor moves
> >> through cells of tabulars, which is bad.
>
> Ok we'll see
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 02:37:43PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > But spellchecking is much faster!
> > I believe that they have similar implementation so why there is a
> > difference ?
>
> One does activate nodraw() the other doesn't (and it's not possible to do
> it in a good way), the implem
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 02:18:08PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > It was a L shape before my update.
> > Now it should be the normal bar shape.
>
> Sorry I thought I did update, but apparently I didn't. But could you tell
> me why we need that extra locking_inset->lyxCode() != Inset::ERT_CODE,
>
On 14-Aug-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
>> It's really easy to do this, but the question is do we want to do this?
>
> Yes.
Well as I said it's easy to do just override the functions and return false
(or string() for spellchecker) after unlocking the inset!
>> Won't fix for 1.2.0 and after that I re
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 09:38:34AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > - The spellchecking doesn't ignore the text in ERT insets
>
> It's really easy to do this, but the question is do we want to do this?
Yes.
> > - Searching is very slow in tabulars (much slower than spellchecking!)
>
> Won't fix
On 14-Aug-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> It was a L shape before my update.
> Now it should be the normal bar shape.
Sorry I thought I did update, but apparently I didn't. But could you tell
me why we need that extra locking_inset->lyxCode() != Inset::ERT_CODE,
shouldn't you instead ask for a latex_l
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 09:41:12AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 13-Aug-2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Log message:
> > Use normal cursor shape in ERT insets.
>
> Well it seems we have there a L cursor shape now, why?
> IMO this type of changes should be discussed first!
It was
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 02:51:46AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 12:55:18AM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > - When doing selection with the mouse, and releasing the mouse over an inset,
> >the inset should not be opened.
>
> an ooolld bug. xforms doesn't differentiate bet
On 14-Aug-2001 Reinhard Stepanek wrote:
> As requested the icons are now downloadable at
>
> http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/Reinhard.Stepanek/lyx/lyx_artwork_icons.html
BTW: I like this logo too:
http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/Reinhard.Stepanek/lyx/lyx_logo_30_color_bgwhite_noshade.gif
Jürg
On 14-Aug-2001 Reinhard Stepanek wrote:
> As requested the icons are now downloadable at
>
> http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/Reinhard.Stepanek/lyx/lyx_artwork_icons.html
I had a look at your lyx-banner page and while the first one is nice it
has IMO to much colors. Is it possible to have it with fe
As requested the icons are now downloadable at
http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/Reinhard.Stepanek/lyx/lyx_artwork_icons.html
Reinhard
I came to the conclusion that I'd greatly appreciate a single mathed LFUN,
preferably called LFUN_MATH and the command "math".
Yes, that's one of the old proposals in bad disguise.
1. From the user point of view there is not much difference between
'math_insert ' and 'math insert xxx'
2
> The ^@ char is invisible on the LyX screen (but it can be deleted).
Fixed.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I re-worked that feature a bit and committed again. I will remove it again
if some majority or Those Who Know object.
I know that it was a bit controversial, so let's re-iterate:
Old behaviour:
select texti outside math, press C-m
-> selection goes away
empty math box appears
Ne
On 13-Aug-2001 Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> Lgb, I think you should consider to use one of Reinhard's banners
> for the pre-release, because I think they are nice. I like the one
> with some color on it, but I suppose you can choose what you want.
Well while I find them nice they have far
> > Good idea.
>
> Well for the sign we did that already for for the date have a look at the
> last ones I inserted ;)
Yes, but not all the boys have been that nice - including me.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > - The spellchecking doesn't ignore the text in ERT insets
>
> It's really easy to do this, but the question is do we want to do this?
I think so. Most of the ERT stuff is not "proper text".
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 14-Aug-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> There are a lot of developer warning notes, some that seem to have been
>> around forever.
>> Suggestion: Date and sign new ones.
>
> Good idea.
Well for the sign we did that already for for the date have a look at the
last ones I inserted ;)
Jürg
On 13-Aug-2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Log message:
> Use normal cursor shape in ERT insets.
Well it seems we have there a L cursor shape now, why?
IMO this type of changes should be discussed first!
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-
As I told you all I'm out until I finish my "real" job so all the below have
or to wait until I have time to do it again, or someone else has to do the
fix. Anyway I will comment on some of them to give you an idea what I think
should be done for 1.2.0.
> - The spellchecking doesn't ignore the te
28 matches
Mail list logo
