On the shoulders of giants...
Wow! I almost have it all working now.
The menu looks a bit funny at the moment but I think I can fix it...
I have top menu generation running great -- since it was the old code just
cleaned up a bit.
The side menu is spaced out a lot for some reason but otherwi
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> I can't wait...
>
> I've started merging already but it'll be a little while before you see
> anything on my site. Have to recode the autogenerated menu slightly.
>
> I might make a second menu class for the short title case and remove the
> option of a top
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 03:11:04PM +1200, Michael Koziarski wrote:
> > > In opera it looks ... wrong :) There's a screenshot up at
> > > www.koziarski.org/LyX. Looks good in mozilla.
> >
> > Try it again
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 03:11:04PM +1200, Michael Koziarski wrote:
> > In opera it looks ... wrong :) There's a screenshot up at
> > www.koziarski.org/LyX. Looks good in mozilla.
>
> Try it again please. I do not have Opera. I fixed width of pinmen
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 11:26:06PM -0400 or thereabouts, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 03:11:04PM +1200, Michael Koziarski wrote:
> > In opera it looks ... wrong :) There's a screenshot up at
> > www.koziarski.org/LyX. Looks good in mozilla.
>
> Try it again please. I do not
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 03:11:04PM +1200, Michael Koziarski wrote:
> In opera it looks ... wrong :) There's a screenshot up at
> www.koziarski.org/LyX. Looks good in mozilla.
Try it again please. I do not have Opera. I fixed width of pinmenu to
12em. I had the same problem with Mozilla and righ
> I have made a page that uses instead of for layout. Take a
> look at: http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/LyX/www-user/
In opera it looks ... wrong :) There's a screenshot up at
www.koziarski.org/LyX. Looks good in mozilla.
Unfortunately the menu doesn't look right without css. There must be
a
Allan,
I think I know what's the cause of most of the problems we had with
Netscape's understanding of CSS. is just the nastiest
manifestation of it.
Namely, we use for the layout purposes. That is something we had
to do before, but with CSS there are other ways. W3C guys openly
encourage chan
On Saturday, 23. June 2001 19:40, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> But what happen if for one paper you need some partition into bib
> files, and in a different paper you need another partition ?
> Since I don't use multiple bibs I don't know if this is a common
> situation.
Bibunits has the better cards her
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> Now to make it work. Anyone want to guess what Netscape might prefer in
> the way of XHTML blockquotes etc.?
With XHTML-strict or XHTML-Transitional put anywhere in an LDN webpage the
following line:
crash netscape
or try this valid variation:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 07:16:01PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> It's a matter of personal taste. Both packages have some advantages and
> some disadvantages. I tried them both and decided to use bibtopic
> finally.
> As you say, the biggest disadvantage with bibtopic is that you have to
>
On Saturday, 23. June 2001 15:21, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> The documentation should be written when a full support is written.
> For 1.2.0, we will probably have only a small paragraph in NEWS.
OK.
> I'm also wondering if bibtopic is the package we want to support.
> The multibib package uses a diff
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> I haven't figured out what Netscape doesn't like yet :(
Well when you sit down and spend 5 uninterrupted seconds thnking about it
the answer is obvious. Netscape hates QOTM -- Quote of the Month.
This was also the biggest change I made between older work
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> > I switched back to XHTML-Transitional but Netscape still isn't rendering
> > all the valid LDNs :(
>
> Even better I can now crash Netscape by going to any three consecutive
> LDNs using the "Next" or "Previous" nav
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 02:45:44PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I think it depends on when this will be implemented. If it will be on
> 1.3. the interim solution with the extraline in the preamble would be
> o.k., if it will be 2.x I would prefer a way where you don't have to
> put extra
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi Allan,
>
> I expected you to be in Italy which should be in the same time zone.
I wished, but the falling star must have been a piece of space junk.
> As I mentioned before, I am not able to spend too much time on LyX right
> now. So if we make a
Hi Allan,
I expected you to be in Italy which should be in the same time zone.
As I mentioned before, I am not able to spend too much time on LyX right
now. So if we make another attempt to fix Sun CC problem we have to do it
in _one_ session; with direct response, online discussion, and direct
p
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> I switched back to XHTML-Transitional but Netscape still isn't rendering
> all the valid LDNs :(
Even better I can now crash Netscape by going to any three consecutive
LDNs using the "Next" or "Previous" navbar entries!
Pretty cool hey!
I suspect I've do
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> Take a look at:
>
> http://www.devel.lyx.org/~rae/www-user/
>
> I've switched to XHTML1-strict and started refining some of the CSS black
> magic -- I'm making it up as I go along based on what the DTD's say is
> okay. If that works okay then I'll be
On Saturday, 23. June 2001 13:55, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> The no temp-dir problem will happen even if the user do not use
> bibtopic (in this case it is harmless, there are just unnecessary
> runs of bibtex). There number of people that will suffer from this
> problem might be larger than the number
> Take a look at:
>
> http://www.devel.lyx.org/~rae/www-user/
I like it :) The navigation bar and the links don't look right but I
*really* like the new background colour.
> I've switched to XHTML1-strict
XHTML Strict is good, I just used transitional to allow http://www.koziarski.co
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 01:36:16PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I think Herbert is right. The case that the tmp dir is not used right
> appears seldom compared with the case that bibtopic fails because the
> user doesn't know about the extra line to put in the preamble (this
> will appear
On Saturday, 23. June 2001 10:28, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 07:34:39PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> What do others think ?
I think Herbert is right. The case that the tmp dir is not used right
appears seldom compared with the case that bibtopic fails because the
user doesn't
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> I'd kind of like to make use of the blue from our existing banner but I'm
> not sure I want a screen full of it and then we have the poblem of what
> colour looks good as foreground on it. But then there are also
> colour-blindness or discernment/contrast
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, John Levon wrote:
> > > Why is it always me who has unreproducible problems ;)
> >
> > You're doing bleeding edge stuff?
>
> I've found gcc 3 to be far stabler than gcc 2.96 ...
I was meaning stability of program but the (possible/probable) change of
interfaces etc.
[...]
>
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 06:56:27PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, John Levon wrote:
>
> >
> > I built from clean CVS source - still the problem.
> >
> > Using gcc 3.0, xforms 0.88
> >
> > Why is it always me who has unreproducible problems ;)
>
> You're doing bleeding edge stuff
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 07:34:39PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > > > you don't answered my question why this could happened.
> > > > from my point of view there is no need to choose
> > > > other filenames than the default ones. the old way
> > > > is the
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, John Levon wrote:
>
> I built from clean CVS source - still the problem.
>
> Using gcc 3.0, xforms 0.88
>
> Why is it always me who has unreproducible problems ;)
You're doing bleeding edge stuff?
Actually I saw an email on the libsigc++ list saying that gcc-3.0 breaks
the
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 07:34:39PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > > you don't answered my question why this could happened.
> > > from my point of view there is no need to choose
> > > other filenames than the default ones. the old way
> > > is the better way.
> >
> > You can have foo.lyx and foo
Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> John Levon wrote:
> >
> > I create a figure float and insert a graphics inside it with a caption.
> >
> > I add a "LOF".
> >
> > The figure is not listed (there is no contents of LOF).
> >
> > What's going on ?
>
> than the caption has no caption-paragraph-style
>
> Herb
30 matches
Mail list logo
