Re: wedged cvs server fixed

"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 06:17:07PM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: | > Thanks for the reports. | | FYI: | | Now I rsync like this: | | cd /cvs/lyx; rsync -aCz --delete baywatch.lyx.org::lyxcvs . | | I was missing the --delete flag before,

Re: www.lyx.org

On Thu, 31 May 2001, Allan Rae wrote: > On Wed, 30 May 2001, Michael Koziarski wrote: > [...] > > There is a gzipped patch for www-user, this is a bit more than just > > validation fixes. In preparation for the CSS use I've stripped out > > all tags. So applying this patch will make the site a

Re: A change to the ButtonController. Was: Re: [BUG] citation dialog

On Wed, 30 May 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: > On Wednesday 30 May 2001 14:33, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Angus> does the attached patch do what you want? If so, can I leave > > Angus> this for you to apply to head and to 1.1.6?

Re: wedged cvs server fixed

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 06:17:07PM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: > Thanks for the reports. FYI: Now I rsync like this: cd /cvs/lyx; rsync -aCz --delete baywatch.lyx.org::lyxcvs . I was missing the --delete flag before, so this was bound to happen. I apparently rsynced over a CVS temp

wedged cvs server fixed

Thanks for the reports. ---Kayvan

Re: cvs server

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 08:19:55PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > What does this mean? > > cvs server: [16:17:56] waiting for lyx's lock in > /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/config > Kayvan? > > Garst I don't know. Does it still happen? ---Kayvan

FYI on Solaris lyx does no build when -g is omitted

I though I would pass this information along so others would know of the problem. I was compiling lyx-1.1.6fix2 on a Sun Ultra-60 running Solaris 2.6 using gcc 2.95.3 and the assembler from /usr/ccs/bin. The problem was that the assembler failed on one of the files when debugging was turned of

cvs server

What does this mean? cvs server: [16:17:56] waiting for lyx's lock in /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/config Kayvan? Garst

Re: What is this "Senseless" stuff?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | | What is this? How do I get rid of it? All my other figure floats | | are showing as "Figure #:" instead of "Senseless" | | And all your capitons should the right label after a reload. | I have failed to see why the captions labes are wrong on i

Re: Unknown function error in BRANCH_NATBIB

On Thu, 31 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > typing, I get a "Unknown function" error printed at the bottom and no text > inserted. I can open existing documents, but can't type new text. Any > ideas? Lars wrote back about a possible bad key bindings file. That was it. I had an old ~/.lyx-cvs d

Re: What is this "Senseless" stuff?

"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | New figure floats with captions get a "Senseless" label (even | though it looks fine in the postscript view). | | What is this? How do I get rid of it? All my other figure floats | are showing as "Figure #:" instead of "Senseless" And all your ca

Re: Unknown function error in BRANCH_NATBIB

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi, | | Still playing with the natbib branch. I was able to compile it | successfully once Angus finished his update :-) Gcc-2.96 seems to have | worked okay. However, now when I open a new/existing document and start | typing, I get a "Unknown function" error print

What is this "Senseless" stuff?

New figure floats with captions get a "Senseless" label (even though it looks fine in the postscript view). What is this? How do I get rid of it? All my other figure floats are showing as "Figure #:" instead of "Senseless" ---Kayvan -- Kayvan A. Sylvan

Unknown function error in BRANCH_NATBIB

Hi, Still playing with the natbib branch. I was able to compile it successfully once Angus finished his update :-) Gcc-2.96 seems to have worked okay. However, now when I open a new/existing document and start typing, I get a "Unknown function" error printed at the bottom and no text inserted. I

Re: Lyx 1.1.6fix2: long time to get ps view

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "G" == G Angely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > G> Under LyX 1.1.6fix2, viewing as Postscript takes a very long time > G> comparing to 1.15fix2: > > This problem has been reported under linux by debian users. Are you > one of them? > > JMarc Right: lyx 1.1.6fi

Re: FormParagraph question

Angus Leeming wrote: > > On Thursday 31 May 2001 14:33, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | > > | Lars> Should be "Change Margins" (alt. modify) if course since the > > | La

Re: FormParagraph question

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 05:08:33PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > Jürgen (Jürgen who's putting on his gear for driving home with his > motorcycle before it's going to rain again) > Out of topic, I know. This week the outside temperature has been over 30 C all the days. Tha

Re: now make fails!!!

Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Are these functions meant to be part of namespace std? yes. | Note that I'm using the included cheader directory, so do these files need | upgrading now? no, we will workaround this in another way. | Angus | | | cxx -std strict_ansi -nocleanup -

Re: now make fails!!!

> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Are these functions meant to be part of namespace std? Note Angus> that I'm using the included cheader directory, so do these Angus> files need upgrading now? I tried to upgrade them but failed. So the solution is to add some us

Re: FormParagraph question

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 04:41:22PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: ... > Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 16:41:22 +0200 (CEST) > Reply-To: Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: FormParagraph question > Cc: [EMAIL PRO

Re: FormParagraph question

On 31-May-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > or perhaps we should decouple the spacings from the paragraph... I don't think so. > I_have no problem with having a paragraph "left margin, and right > margin" option, but we should avoid adding too much to this so that > the "correct/nice" solution

Re: autogen.sh error

> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> H. I've just grabbed the latest and greatest from sunsite: Angus> autoconf-2.50/ automake-1.4-p2/ libtool-1.4/ autoconf 2.50 is probably a bit too new now... JMarc

now make fails!!!

Are these functions meant to be part of namespace std? Note that I'm using the included cheader directory, so do these files need upgrading now? Angus cxx -std strict_ansi -nocleanup -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. -I../.. -I../../boost -I../../src/cheaders -I/usr/local/i

Re: autogen.sh error

Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Thursday 31 May 2001 15:18, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Ok this i the version of the tools I use: | > | > [larsbj@trylle libs]$ rpm -q automake autoconf libtool | > automake-1.4p1-1 | > autoconf-2.13-10 | > libtool-1.4-2 | | H. I've just gra

Re: autogen.sh error

On Thursday 31 May 2001 15:37, Angus Leeming wrote: > On Thursday 31 May 2001 15:18, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > Ok this i the version of the tools I use: > > > > [larsbj@trylle libs]$ rpm -q automake autoconf libtool > > automake-1.4p1-1 > > autoconf-2.13-10 > > libtool-1.4-2 > > H. I've

Re: FormParagraph question

Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Well then we probably should remove the vertical margins too as this also | is manual layout and probably we should remove a lot of features and make | lyx base it's output ONLY on paragraph styles! That would be ideal, albeit a bit utopic. | I think

Re: FormParagraph question

On 31-May-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >| This features right now only an indent from the actual left papermargin >| to the right. It does nothing with the right margin! So the name you gave >| it is right, it's just a horizontal offset/indent of

RE: Pagebreak after table

On Thu, 31 May 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > PS: Any new insights concerning the repaint problem with large tables > > inside floats? Even though this bug stops me from using the current cvs in > > daily work, I noticed that table are repainted much less than before! Very > > I'll have a look at

Re: FormParagraph question

On 31-May-2001 Martin Vermeer wrote: > There is a command in plain TeX called \narrower, which narrows both sides > by the amount \parindent, default 20pt. > > I think that's a lot better than allowing the user to enter inches or mm's > or points :-) I don't want narrower margins I want to mov

Re: autogen.sh error

> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> I belive this is a real release: Lars> automake-1.4-p1.tar.gz automake-1.4-p2.tar.gz Lars> Is from ftp.gnu.org (so there is actually one even newer thatn Lars> p1...) OK. JMarc

Re: FormParagraph question

> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> We are in complete agreement. Juergen> #:O( Juergen> Well then we probably should remove the vertical margins too Juergen> as this also is manual layout and probably we should remove a Juergen> lot of features and make lyx base it'

Re: autogen.sh error

On Thursday 31 May 2001 15:18, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Ok this i the version of the tools I use: > > [larsbj@trylle libs]$ rpm -q automake autoconf libtool > automake-1.4p1-1 > autoconf-2.13-10 > libtool-1.4-2 H. I've just grabbed the latest and greatest from sunsite: autoconf-2.50/

Re: FormParagraph question

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 02:50:50PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm > Precedence: bulk > X-No-Archive: yes > List-Post: > List-Help: > List-Unsubscribe: > Delivered-T

Re: FormParagraph question

Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | This features right now only an indent from the actual left papermargin | to the right. It does nothing with the right margin! So the name you gave | it is right, it's just a horizontal offset/indent of the paragraph on the | left side! offset is still

Re: FormParagraph question

Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 31-May-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > But this is not really an offset is it? It is a larger left margin, | > right? (offset: move the whole par left/right without rebreak) | | Well a rebreak on the right side is always needed otherwise we w

RE: Pagebreak after table

On 28-Mar-2001 Michael Schmitt wrote: > PS: Any new insights concerning the repaint problem with large tables > inside floats? Even though this bug stops me from using the current cvs in > daily work, I noticed that table are repainted much less than before! Very I'll have a look at this soon j

Re: FormParagraph question

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 03:29:02PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Lars> yes... this is possible. But with this we are going down the > Lars> path of manual layout and I am not overly fond of this. We > Lars> really need the user to be able to dynamically create new > Lars> paragraph styles (

Re: FormParagraph question

On 31-May-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >| Agreed. This feature was proposed by Juergen and I was not really in >| favor of it at the time. Moreover, if we are to do that, I'd rather >| find a standard package that provides this feature than roll our own >| macro. In fact, all macros but \LyX

Re: autogen.sh error

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> Locally I have also upgraded automake: | | Lars> [larsbj@trylle libs]$ rpm -q automake automake-1.4p1-1 | | Is this thing a real release or something from RH? I belive

Re: FormParagraph question

On 31-May-2001 Angus Leeming wrote: > A! That penny has dropped again. And can this be done for the right > margin also on a per-paragraph basis? Ie, the dialog should have: > > Enlarge Margins -- > Left __ Units > Right __ Units > --

Re: autogen.sh error

Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Thursday 31 May 2001 13:40, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | I'm a novice here. What's going on. What do I need yo do? | | > Most likely you need to upgrade your automake/libtool. | | I've grabbed

Re: FormParagraph question

On 31-May-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > But this is not really an offset is it? It is a larger left margin, > right? (offset: move the whole par left/right without rebreak) Well a rebreak on the right side is always needed otherwise we would go out of the paper, don't you think so? If I say

Re: FormParagraph question

Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Well that's always nice! So what do you propose I do to the dialog. Shall I | just remove the offending "Offset" entry, or shall I leave things as they are | but give the entry a better name such as has been proposed? No no, you should create the use

Re: autogen.sh error

> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Locally I have also upgraded automake: Lars> [larsbj@trylle libs]$ rpm -q automake automake-1.4p1-1 Is this thing a real release or something from RH? JMarc

Re: autogen.sh error

On Thursday 31 May 2001 13:40, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | I'm a novice here. What's going on. What do I need yo do? > Most likely you need to upgrade your automake/libtool. I've grabbed your latest commit Let's call TOP my base lyx directory. I

Re: autogen.sh error

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I'm a novice here. | Lars> What's going on. What do I need yo do? | | Lars> Most likely you need to upgrade your automake/libt

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

On Thursday 31 May 2001 14:35, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Just for information: > | > | Note that I had to remove the files > | boost/aclocal.m4 > | boost/acinclude.m4 > | boost/boost/config.h.in > | by hand and do two extra "cvs upda

Re: FormParagraph question

On Thursday 31 May 2001 14:33, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > | Lars> Should be "Change Margins" (alt. modify) if course since the > | Lars> margins can also be made smaller

Re: autogen.sh error

> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I'm a novice here. Lars> What's going on. What do I need yo do? Lars> Most likely you need to upgrade your automake/libtool. Lars> confit/ltconfig should not be present at all. I ha

Re: FormParagraph question

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> Should be "Change Margins" (alt. modify) if course since the | Lars> margins can also be made smaller. | | This is more difficult... | | Lars> yes... this is possible. B

Re: FormParagraph question

> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Should be "Change Margins" (alt. modify) if course since the Lars> margins can also be made smaller. This is more difficult... Lars> yes... this is possible. But with this we are going down the Lars> path of manual layout and

Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

Just for information: Note that I had to remove the files boost/aclocal.m4 boost/acinclude.m4 boost/boost/config.h.in by hand and do two extra "cvs update"s to remove the cvs messages cvs server: warning: boost/aclocal.m4 is not (any longer) pertinent cvs s

Re: Are dead keys dead ?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | I will precise here what I had stated earlier about the dead keys not working. | I am using the latest CVS version, right after an update. | I have selected "No keymap" in the Edit->Preferences popup. Please try again now. AFAIK everything should work now. --

Re: Please upgrade libtool in lyx

Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi, | | please upgrade libttol in lyx. All versions prior to 1.4 cause | miscompilations under NetBSD/sparc-1.5. libtool has been upgraded. -- Lgb

Re: FormParagraph question

Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | A! That penny has dropped again. And can this be done for the right | margin also on a per-paragraph basis? Ie, the dialog should have: | | Enlarge Margins -- | Left __ Units | Right __ Units | -

Re: FormParagraph question

On Thursday 31 May 2001 13:47, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On 31-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > | > | > This looks fine to me (except the horizontal offset which does not > | > make a lot of sense). > | > | Why? I find it usefull that yo

Re: FormParagraph question

Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 31-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | | > This looks fine to me (except the horizontal offset which does not | > make a lot of sense). | | Why? I find it usefull that you can define a horizontal offset at which | the paragraph text starts (this

Re: compile times

Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 31-May-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > | > gcc 3.0 as of yeasterday: | > | > real43m24.997s | > user35m31.490s | > sys 1m35.310s | > | > gcc 2.96: | > | > real45m9.600s | > user29m47.260s | > sys 8m28.380s | > | > Thi

Re: autogen.sh error

Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I'm a novice here. What's going on. What do I need yo do? Most likely you need to upgrade your automake/libtool. confit/ltconfig should not be present at all. I have some fixes in my three so wait until my next commit. -- Lgb

Re: FormParagraph question

On 31-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > This looks fine to me (except the horizontal offset which does not > make a lot of sense). Why? I find it usefull that you can define a horizontal offset at which the paragraph text starts (this was before in the Extra Options). What is senseless in

RE: compile times

On 31-May-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > gcc 3.0 as of yeasterday: > > real43m24.997s > user35m31.490s > sys 1m35.310s > > gcc 2.96: > > real45m9.600s > user29m47.260s > sys 8m28.380s > > This is --without-included-string What PC? I've around 17m on my PIII 800

RE: Feedback from www.lyx.org

On 31-May-2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Marco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) entered the > following feedback message on the LyX home page: > > > grazie grazie a chi ha sviluppato questo software... > finalmente ho potuto to

autogen.sh error

I'm a novice here. What's going on. What do I need yo do? Angus aleem@pneumon:devel-> ./autogen.sh Locating GNU m4... found: gm4 Generate acinclude.m4... done. Building macros... . lib/reLyX sigc++ boost done. Building config header template... .

Re: FormParagraph question

On Thursday 31 May 2001 11:37, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> I've go "Layout" and "Indent first" on the > Angus> same line because the "Indent first" will be disabled for > Angus> "most" Layout styles (Title, Section etc). > > What do you mean about indent being disabled? On which textcl

Re: FormParagraph question

Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Sorry, I'd got this wrong. The call I want to replace with a signal is | LyXView::setLayout, called only by LyXView and in The call in LyXView should be changed to call the correct LFUN instead. | BufferView::Pimpl::Dispatch(): | case LFUN_LAY

Re: FormParagraph question

> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> So, you'd like me to add the Toolbar combox to the dialog too? Angus> Done (see attached). This looks fine to me (except the horizontal offset which does not make a lot of sense). Angus> I've go "Layout" and "Indent first" on th

Re: FormParagraph question

> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> On 31-May-2001 Angus Leeming wrote: >> So, you'd like me to add the Toolbar combox to the dialog too? Done >> (see attached). I've go "Layout" and "Indent first" on the same >> line because the "Indent first" will be disabled f

compile times

gcc 3.0 as of yeasterday: real43m24.997s user35m31.490s sys 1m35.310s gcc 2.96: real45m9.600s user29m47.260s sys 8m28.380s This is --without-included-string -- Lgb

Re: FormParagraph question

On Thursday 31 May 2001 10:06, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Actually, I've been giving a little thought to updating the > | Paragraph dialog as the user moves around the document. > | If an inset dialog is open, then moving the cursor from one >

Re: FormParagraph question

On Thursday 31 May 2001 10:07, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > > Now what does Apply and Ok, apply all the Layout as > > > now or only the visible tab? > > Your message is too cryptic for me; you'll have to explain further. > It's just that now you don't see all options in one window so I wondered >

Re: FormParagraph question

On 31-May-2001 Angus Leeming wrote: >> Now what does Apply and Ok, apply all the Layout as now or only the visible >> tab? > > Your message is too cryptic for me; you'll have to explain further. It's just that now you don't see all options in one window so I wondered if only the visible fields

Re: FormParagraph question

Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Actually, I've been giving a little thought to updating the Paragraph dialog | as the user moves around the document. | | If an inset dialog is open, then moving the cursor from one inset to another | of the same type emits a signal and the dialog up

Re: FormParagraph question

On 31-May-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I think it is wrong... even if it is analog to the document syle > change in the Document dialog. > > just my gut feeling. I don't have any strong opinions on this... > except that it might hamper cleanup a bit. Well I don't have strong feelings abou

Re: FormParagraph question

On Thursday 31 May 2001 09:41, Juergen Vigna wrote: > This seems good to me I just would like to know what Jean-Marc tells us > about having the Layout-Combo also in the Layout Paragraph. > Now what does Apply and Ok, apply all the Layout as now or only the visible > tab? Your message is too cry

Re: www.lyx.org

On Wed, 30 May 2001, Michael Koziarski wrote: [...] > There is a gzipped patch for www-user, this is a bit more than just > validation fixes. In preparation for the CSS use I've stripped out > all tags. So applying this patch will make the site a little > ugly (if you have ugly default fonts th

Re: FormParagraph question

Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 31-May-2001 Angus Leeming wrote: | | > So, you'd like me to add the Toolbar combox to the dialog too? Done (see | > attached). I've go "Layout" and "Indent first" on the same line because the | > "Indent first" will be disabled for "most" Layout s

Re: FormParagraph question

On Thursday 31 May 2001 09:32, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Note also that the dialog now supports per-paragraph spacing, fullfilling an > | oft-stated wish by Lars! > > Yeah! > > (now help me with the Float dialog :-) ) Certainly. But note tha

Re: string <-> lyxstring

Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 30-May-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > | > 2001-05-30 Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > * boost/config.hpp: change include of to "LString.h". | > | > I am afraid we will see more and more of these changes to be able to | > still

Re: FormParagraph question

On 31-May-2001 Angus Leeming wrote: > So, you'd like me to add the Toolbar combox to the dialog too? Done (see > attached). I've go "Layout" and "Indent first" on the same line because the > "Indent first" will be disabled for "most" Layout styles (Title, Section etc). This seems good to me I

Re: Attempting (and failing) to compile natbib branch

Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Dear me-too's, | | You all use RH7.0 or RH7.1. Mike in his email stated he was using Mdk8.0 | just as I currently am. The gcc-2.96-0.48 included therein ICEs on a | number of files in the LyX source tree and as (I think) John pointed out | they seem to b

Re: FormParagraph question

Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Note also that the dialog now supports per-paragraph spacing, fullfilling an | oft-stated wish by Lars! Yeah! (now help me with the Float dialog :-) ) | If people are happy with this, I might code it up ;-) Without even looking at it, I am in favou

Re: CVS build error

Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 31-May-2001 Garst R. Reese wrote: | | > It did not fix the problem with gcc-3.0-20010528 | | ??? | | Does someone know where the strcmp & co. functions are delcared there? | | Could you try to include before in that file and | see if that helps

Re: FormParagraph question

> Why did you remove the Type? IMO it would be good to be able to set the > type of a paragraph too here (I yesterday asked what this Type is not > to remove it ;), if I assume right the Type is the same as we now have > in the combox on the mainscreen f.ex.: Standard, List, ... This is surely > p

Re: CVS build error

Juergen Vigna wrote: > > On 31-May-2001 Garst R. Reese wrote: > > > It did not fix the problem with gcc-3.0-20010528 > > ??? > > Does someone know where the strcmp & co. functions are delcared there? > > Could you try to include before in that file and > see if that helps? > > Jürgen

Re: CVS build error

On 31-May-2001 Garst R. Reese wrote: > It did not fix the problem with gcc-3.0-20010528 ??? Does someone know where the strcmp & co. functions are delcared there? Could you try to include before in that file and see if that helps? Jürgen -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._

RE: string <-> lyxstring

On 30-May-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > 2001-05-30 Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * boost/config.hpp: change include of to "LString.h". > > I am afraid we will see more and more of these changes to be able to > still use lyxstring. Hopefully there will not be enought of t

Re: Attempting (and failing) to compile natbib branch

Dear me-too's, You all use RH7.0 or RH7.1. Mike in his email stated he was using Mdk8.0 just as I currently am. The gcc-2.96-0.48 included therein ICEs on a number of files in the LyX source tree and as (I think) John pointed out they seem to be using a something even older than RH's 2.96-69.

Re: FormParagraph question

On 31-May-2001 Angus Leeming wrote: > Note that the "Horizontal offset" is for the whole paragraph. Lars says that > this should be removed and replaced with a "standard indented" paragraph > style. Till that's written, the choice stays in the dialog. Good choice! Also this is a left indent a

Re: FormParagraph question

Here's an updated Paragraph dialog which addresses Jürgen and Lars points. I think it's cleaner and clearer than the original, but what do you think. Comments please! Note that the "Horizontal offset" is for the whole paragraph. Lars says that this should be removed and replaced with a "standa