On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
[...]
> time lyx -x lyx-quit UserGuide.lyx
Cool! A LyX Benchmark!
Before too long we'll have a complete scripted benchmark and become the
WinStone of the free software world ;-)
Allan. (ARRae)
This moves the 'update' loop from the template to the macro. It is still
the template that gets updated, so it should not fix the bug yet, but I
believe it is a step in the right direction.
(If we have several macros with individual arguments, rendering their
common template can't work. So we ne
On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 07:58:15PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>
> This patch includes the previous one and adds the same memore saving
> as with the paragraph parameters, but now also for LyXFont.
>
> It raises binary size a bit more than I would like, but the memory
> footprint for Us
> When you have 512 MB that is not a problem. ;-)
Does LyX still compile with just 512 MB? I mean, taking under an hour or
so? I really don't have any recent evidence...
Seriously, I think people should keep in mind that other people need to
compile LyX on older hardware from time to time and h
On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 07:51:32PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 11:09:07AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |
> | > Whoeyy! That sounds like me, before I got the new laptop.
> | > (If I only could get
This patch includes the previous one and adds the same memore saving
as with the paragraph parameters, but now also for LyXFont.
It raises binary size a bit more than I would like, but the memory
footprint for Userguide is now ~500 Kb.
Comments?
Lgb
diffie
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 11:09:07AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > Whoeyy! That sounds like me, before I got the new laptop.
| > (If I only could get some ~128MB more now and I could reduce the
| > complile time even further.)
|
|
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 11:09:07AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Whoeyy! That sounds like me, before I got the new laptop.
> (If I only could get some ~128MB more now and I could reduce the
> complile time even further.)
How can I reduce the compilation time with more memory?
make -j m
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 2 Mar 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | I've discovered a configure/compilation bug.
| > |
| > yes build properly...
| >
| > if you are changing frontends you have to do a make distclean first
On 2 Mar 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I've discovered a configure/compilation bug.
> |
> yes build properly...
>
> if you are changing frontends you have to do a make distclean first.
> (you can try to just delete the config.cache and rerun
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Anyway, thanks to you guys find/replace is now guii (over here).
| I've got the
| following dilemma on which I need your advice. Find/replace uses generalized
| copies of the members FindBackward(), FindForward(), and IsStringInText()
| from the LyXT
> > blah.
> >
> > Careful... We've only just recovered from the last time this conversation
> > was started!!!
>
> They mostly don't join in because they mostly never have.
I guess they are just being wise...
> Either that or
> they are content with the xforms frontend as is like most o
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > This is something that I have been wanting to try out for a long time.
| > It makes the binary ~5Kb larger, and makes the memory footprint, when
| > the Userguide is loaded ~300Kb smaller.
|
| I have not compiled it and I am obviously blind: Where do
13 matches
Mail list logo
