On 16-Feb-2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I've been trying to figure out a polite way to say this for some time.
> Juergen just pushed me over the edge :-)
Well you shouldn't have put that smily there on a friday, you're a heretic! ;)
Jürgen (who still thinks we did the right choice)
On 18 Feb 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> and you had to read it...
and reply to it. Just so you know it worked ;-)
Allan. (ARRae)
Hi folks,
Would one of you please fix this? This is agains the latest 1.2.0cvs.
"make dist" produces:
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/kayvan/src/lyx/boost'
rm -rf ../lyx-1.2.0cvs/boost
mkdir ../lyx-1.2.0cvs/boost
chmod 777 ../lyx-1.2.0cvs/boost
here=`cd . && pwd`; \
top_distdir=`cd ../lyx-1.
Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hello,
|
| "alt+p CursorLeft/Right" can be used to change the environment depth.
|
| This command is not defined for captions even though it would be
| quite obvious
| what the user's intention is (section shall become subsection, chapter shall
|
Hello,
"alt+p CursorLeft/Right" can be used to change the environment depth.
This command is not defined for captions even though it would be quite obvious
what the user's intention is (section shall become subsection, chapter shall
become section, etc.).
Maybe someone can add this small feat
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Of course, light blue arrows smelling like tuna are much better than
> ordinary b's in a display math formula and there certainly would be no
> need to document or explain this change, but I fear it would come down
> a bit surprisingly on people who hav
OK, this is the second time a working IG viewing is available, this time
its done better (or so I hope).
It is currently synchronous, that means that lyx waits until all the
images are loaded before it continues to do anything.
To make it asynchronous I need to be able to fork a second process
> This is not a bug!
> I've intentionally changed the behavior of Ctrl+enter in a display math
> formula to create an align* environment (which has 2 "columns") instead of
> the the eqnarray* (which has 3 "columns"), as the former is much better than
> the latter.
Ah... nice that you have not cha