I downloaded the patch for ScriptWriter to abiWord. They have a long way
to go before they catch up with LyX :), but Larry is right about it
being part of a much bigger project, the GNU Freefilm project. Maybe a
note in LWN to remind folks about hollywood is in order.
Garst
Larry Marso wrote:
>
> No. But they're obviously bringing together widely divergent tools
> for an "integrated" studio solution. Tell me this really makes
> sense, from a writer's point of view? I doubt it.
>
It only makes sense for a "shooting script." The original writer is
rarely involved
Incorporation of this package would be *much* appreciated here.
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 07:49:07PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> I had a quick look at this class and realized that to support this is
> LyX is very _easy_, albeit _very_ simple support.
No. But they're obviously bringing together widely divergent tools
for an "integrated" studio solution. Tell me this really makes
sense, from a writer's point of view? I doubt it.
On Sun, Mar 05, 2000 at 02:15:18PM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Larry Marso wrote:
> >
> > Did you provide the
Finally got a few minutes free to try compiling lyx-devel. (My current
version is 1.0.4pre1.) So I may have some errors to let you know about.
autogen.sh should test automake's version. 1.3 doesn't understand the "-c"
option, so it fails saying it didn't find automake.
-Amir
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" wrote:
>
> > > Also, I would suggest that all classes be made assignable such
> > > that memory management is simplified. There is no reason that the
> > > user of this library has to fiddle with new and delete.
> >
> > Could you elaborate on this.
>
> Every class shou
> > Also, I would suggest that all classes be made assignable such
> > that memory management is simplified. There is no reason that the
> > user of this library has to fiddle with new and delete.
>
> Could you elaborate on this.
Every class should define these methods:
class Foo {
public:
Kevin Atkinson wrote:
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" wrote:
>
> > Please look it over and let me know what you think as far as it being
> > suitable for use in LyX. Thanks.
>
> It is suitable for LyX, as far as I can tell.
Thanks.
> Also, I would suggest that all classes be made assignable such
Larry Marso wrote:
>
> Did you provide the wrong url, mistakenly?
>
> Try:
>
> http://freefilm.cx/software/
>
> --
> lsm
Yep
Thanks. Sorry for the mix-up. Do you have abiWord?
Garst
> Please look it over and let me know what you think as far as it being
> suitable for use in LyX. Thanks.
It is suitable for LyX, as far as I can tell.
My main critique is not regarding the design as such, but rather
that it is not modern C++.
I realize that you have your reasons to do so (ai
Did you provide the wrong url, mistakenly?
Try:
http://freefilm.cx/software/
--
lsm
On Sat, Mar 04, 2000 at 10:24:27AM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Hi folks. I noticed an announcement on freshmeat that there is a script
> writing patch for abiWord.
> http://www.tvwriter.com/script.html
> I
Here is a better description of my proposed library.
Please look it over and let me know what you think as far as it being
suitable for use in LyX. Thanks.
Portable Spell Checker Interface Library
On Sat, Mar 04, 2000 at 03:08:38PM -0800, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
>
> > Hardcoding anything for Scrap layout is not an option unless it is in
> > the layout file. This is also a more general problem.
>
> I'm working on it. I've added a new boolean AllowMultipleSpaces to the
> layout file and am m
13 matches
Mail list logo
