;> I think some things needs to be defined :
>>> - best practices for a good container is (no udev, syslog conf...)
>>> - what minimal features we expect from container creation scripts.
>>> - who works on it.
>>>
>> Hi,
>> I'm rather new
Le 03/02/2010 12:02, Dominik Schulz a écrit :
> Am Montag 01 Februar 2010 08:51:56 schrieb l...@zitta.fr:
>
>> Dominik, you said that you started some work. anything visible?
>>
> You can fetch my work from the "tex" branch at http://git.gauner.org/lxc-
>
hi,
I'm trying to provide a crypted volume to a container :
- So i have added it to the container's fstab :
r...@ksxxx:~# cat /var/lib/lxc/newzer.ovh2.p.zitta.fr/fstab
/lxc/root/newzer.ovh2.p.zitta.fr
/var/lib/lxc/newzer.ovh2.p.zitta.fr/rootfs none rbind 0 0
/
Le 02/03/2010 18:13, Daniel Lezcano a écrit :
>
> l...@zitta.fr wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to provide a crypted volume to a container :
>> - So i have added it to the container's fstab :
>> r...@ksxxx:~# cat /var/lib/lxc/newzer.ovh2.p.z
't and this error message appears on the screen :
>>
>> mountall:/dev/ppp: Operation not permitted
>> mountall:/dev/net/tun: Operation not permitted
>> mountall:/dev/loop0: Operation not permitted
>>
>>
In order to "containeri
'm testing a new version of my provisioning scripts.
> Can you give the kernel version, the lxc version, the container
> configuration and the command used to spawn the container ?
config as attachment.
black provisioning # uname -a
Linux black 2.6.31-zen11-lxc-bt #1 ZEN SMP PREEMPT Tue Feb 23 09
> curious message, but it works:
>>>>
>>> Do you mean you created a system container with karmic inside ?
>>>
>> Yes, I'm testing a new version of my provisioning scripts.
>>
>>> Can you give the kernel version, the lxc versio
mean you created a system container with karmic inside ?
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, I'm testing a new version of my provisioning scripts.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Can you give the kernel version, the lxc version, the container
s that my 2.6.31 kernel loosed 2 config
>> items from my previous config :
>> CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT
>> CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
>>
>> do you think this is the problem ?
>
> hmm,
>
> this looks like more a pid namespace leak to me.
>
> C.
g...@black /etc/kernel
Hi,
With a friend, we installed lxc on his server.
We spend 1 hour on the kernel config because we didn't knew :
- that lxc-checkconfig is a bash script and it can check a config before
running it
- which kernel config item whas not good
- that CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES is obsolete
bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev_______
Lxc-devel mailing list
Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/lis
This script is a part of lxc-provider which is a provisioning tool for lxc.
You should not use this script alone, and it is a old version.
You could read the script to understand what it does or use the entire
product :
http://sourceforge.net/projects/lxc-provider/
regards,
Guillaume ZITTA
Le
e that with union
> mounts / unionfs to do a linux-vservers style unify. But... That also
> prevents this problem because the container's rootfs is NOT a real fs in
> the host, it's the bind mount and that insulates the hosts fs and mount
> points from any actions in the co
disk quotas
>>> in the container and I'm hoping to also eventually use that with union
>>> mounts / unionfs to do a linux-vservers style unify. But... That also
>>> prevents this problem because the container's rootfs is NOT a real fs in
>>> the host,
t;> Regards,
>>
>> Guillaume ZITTA
>>
>> Le 17/05/2010 16:31, Wilhelm a écrit :
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have a slight problem using a lucid container (on a lucid host): if I
>>> start the container via lxc-start, no console login starts
Hello,
There is bug related to pivotdir from src/lxc/conf.c
Old root is not unmounted if you accidentally put '/' at start of
lxc.pivotdir. For example:
lxc.pivotdir = /pivotdir
This bug is critical as lxc silently starts container leaving old root mounted.
I would check if nothing is
This can do the job for archlinux:
https://raw.github.com/tokland/arch-bootstrap/master/arch-bootstrap.sh
On 06/02/13 23:06, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> A recent threat on the lxc-users reminded me that I'm lacking a few
> templates for testing under LXC. OpenVZ has a number
Commit 0ae4f887 ("lxc: introduce lxc_execute()" - Greg Kurz) introduced
a regression with the use of lxc-execute for containers with large
argument lists. In lxc-0.7.5, the following command produced 10
lines of output:
lxc-execute -n test -- /usr/bin/printf '%s\n&#
18 matches
Mail list logo
