Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH 1/1] lxc-ps: Nit - Avoid blank CONTAINER column

2010-02-13 Thread Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Serge E. Hallyn [se...@us.ibm.com] wrote: | Quoting Michel Normand (norm...@fr.ibm.com): | > Le jeudi 11 février 2010 à 11:08 +0100, Michel Normand a écrit : | > > Le mercredi 10 février 2010 à 20:25 -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu a écrit : | > > > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu | >

Re: [lxc-devel] devpts instances

2010-06-07 Thread Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Ferenc Wagner [wf...@niif.hu] wrote: | Hi, | | Reading the kernel documentation of devpts, I got the impression that if | the host uses the "legacy" devpts mode, root in a container can always | mount its devpts instance. Is this really so? If yes, it might be Yes... | worth noting somewhere n

[lxc-devel] [RFC][PATCH][lxc]: unfreeze while stopping

2010-06-08 Thread Sukadev Bhattiprolu
I am not too sure, but if user wants to stop a container is there a reason not to implicitly unfreeze the container and stop ? --- From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:42:00 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/1]: unfreeze while stopping container When a container is being stopped, it must

[lxc-devel] lxc_spawn() in lxc_restart()

2010-06-08 Thread Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Hi, The following commit for restart-framework adds a call to lxc_spawn() in lxc_restart(). lxc_spawn() creates a container and in the child calls the restart plugin (which maps to app_restart() from USERCR) commit 196f1d54cef61534e6f98a47956cc87bffb6152e Author: Cedric Le Goater

Re: [lxc-devel] [RFC][PATCH][lxc]: unfreeze while stopping

2010-06-09 Thread Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Michel Normand [norm...@fr.ibm.com] wrote: | Le mardi 08 juin 2010 à 19:07 -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu a écrit : | > I am not too sure, but if user wants to stop a container is there a | > reason not to implicitly unfreeze the container and stop ? | > | > --- | > From: Suka

[lxc-devel] [PATCH 1/2]: Ensure freezer state has changed

2010-07-09 Thread Sukadev Bhattiprolu
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Ensure frezer state has changed A write to the freezer.state file does not gurantee that the state has changed. To ensure that the freezer state is either FROZEN or THAWED, read the freezer state and if it has not changed, repeat the write

[lxc-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Must unfreeze while stopping container

2010-07-09 Thread Sukadev Bhattiprolu
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Must unfreeze while stopping container As pointed out by Dan Smith, when a container is being stopped, it must also be unfrozen after posting the SIGKILL. Otherwise if the container is frozen when the SIGKILL is posted, the SIGKILL will remain

Re: [lxc-devel] Linux-CR and LXC migration

2011-01-05 Thread Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Carlos N. A. Corrêa [carlos.nil...@gmail.com] wrote: | | I did my part in reading through the list archives and getting | | - https://ckpt.wiki.kernel.org/images-ckpt/4/46/Linux-cr-ols2010.pdf | - https://ckpt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page | - https://ckpt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Link-LX