On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Eric W. Biederman
wrote:
> Jeremy Andrus writes:
>
> > On Sep 25, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Eric W. Biederman
> wrote:
> >
> >> Janne Karhunen writes:
> >>
> >>> That being said, is there a valid reason why binder is part of device
> >>> namespace here instead of IPC?
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael J Coss (michael.c...@alcatel-lucent.com):
> > I've been looking at this problem for some time to help solve my very
> > specific use case. In our case we are using containers to provide
> > individual "desktops" to a number
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <
gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 02:34:54PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > So the big issues for a device namespace to solve are filtering which
> > devices a container has access to and being able to dynamicall
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 10:28:55PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 02:34:54PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > So the big issues for a device namespace to solve are filtering which
>
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/lxc/lxc
Commit: fe218ca38358dd69dd51fca6433088ac631d6240
https://github.com/lxc/lxc/commit/fe218ca38358dd69dd51fca6433088ac631d6240
Author: Stéphane Graber
Date: 2013-09-29 (Sun, 29 Sep 2013)
Changed paths:
M src/lxc/lxc
