[lxc-devel] Pull request bugfix branch

2012-10-31 Thread Stéphane Graber
The following changes since commit 60a742e0afd34e02299f64536df35116d68d888d: remove unused lastcap variable (2012-07-31 16:07:18 +0200) are available in the git repository at: https://github.com/lxc/lxc.git upstream-bugfix for you to fetch changes up to 773fb9cad76f43540fddb78c7ffef7237a51a

[lxc-devel] [GIT] lxc branch, master, updated. 7f99e339363d9f005c9386f60a1d8c0953c85053

2012-10-31 Thread Daniel Lezcano
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "lxc". The branch, master has been updated via 7f99e339363d9f005c9386f60a1d8c0953c85053 (commit) via 773fb9cad76f43540fddb78c

[lxc-devel] [GIT] lxc branch, master, updated. 5480b13b1c0b8b653ba4d5aa4249d93f76d79bf5

2012-10-31 Thread Daniel Lezcano
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "lxc". The branch, master has been updated via 5480b13b1c0b8b653ba4d5aa4249d93f76d79bf5 (commit) via a24c5a40dc8c5ae277cd1623

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH] fix "make rpm"

2012-10-31 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 10/04/2012 06:28 PM, Dwight Engen wrote: > RPM doesn't like "-" in the version number and gives: > "error: line 24: Illegal char '-' in: Version: 0.8.0-rc2" > Other packages (bind-utils for example) have used . instead > of - as a seperator. > > Signed-off-by: Dwight Engen > --- Applied.

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH] display warning when yum missing in fedora template

2012-10-31 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 10/04/2012 07:12 PM, Dwight Engen wrote: > This early exit is preventing the warning message that follows it from > being shown. > > Signed-off-by: Dwight Engen > --- Applied. -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH] Add %{dist} tag to differentiate RPM distributions and releases

2012-10-31 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 10/25/2012 07:06 PM, Dwight Engen wrote: > Note that an additional Release field is not necessary for the devel package > as it will follow the primary Release field. For more information on the dist > tag, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag > > Signed-off-by: Dwight Engen > --

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH] Reinstate README file in rootfs directory

2012-10-31 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 10/25/2012 07:46 PM, Dwight Engen wrote: > Change 5fd8314f removed the README file explaining why the > rootfs directory has to exist. Doing so broke the build on > Fedora 17 since this directory will not be created by make > install and thus the spec file cannot find it. > > Signed-off-by: Dwig

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH] Remove unneeded ksrc spec file macro

2012-10-31 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 10/25/2012 09:42 PM, Dwight Engen wrote: > Change 910bb4fa obviated the need for the --with-linuxdir configure > option which means that the ksrc rpm macro no longer makes sense either. > > Signed-off-by: Dwight Engen > --- Applied. Thanks ! --

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH] Fix lxc-ps -- argument processing

2012-10-31 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 10/25/2012 10:45 PM, Dwight Engen wrote: > >From 7531edbca5872537e9cac59d3d51a9f69d93ec2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Dwight Engen > Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:21:53 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] Fix lxc-ps -- argument processing > > lxc-ps is supposed to pass arguments after the -- on to ps. Th

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH] Fix lxc-netstat -- argument processing

2012-10-31 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 10/25/2012 11:25 PM, Dwight Engen wrote: > Commit 21e487f2 introduced the use of getopt, but getopt will fail when > it sees arguments meant for netstat that are not in [short|long]options. > There should not be any ambiguity about arguments with the same letter: > those to the left of the -- ar

Re: [lxc-devel] Please give a clearer error message when the interface name is too long

2012-10-31 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 10/28/2012 12:29 PM, tpo2 wrote: > Currently when configuring a too long interface name with > lxc.network.veth.pair lxc will say: > > lxc_confile - invalid interface name: veth_haproxy_br0 > > leaving the user add odds what possibly could be wrong with that name. > Please give the user a cl

Re: [lxc-devel] [GIT] lxc branch, master, updated. 7f99e339363d9f005c9386f60a1d8c0953c85053

2012-10-31 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Thanks to everyone for fixing this. I am about to release the 0.8.0 version. I will wait a couple of days before adding a tag and release it in case there are some fixes to add. Please test. Thanks ! -- Daniel On 10/31/2012 04:45 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > This is an automated email from th

Re: [lxc-devel] [Lxc-users] [GIT] lxc branch, master, updated. 7f99e339363d9f005c9386f60a1d8c0953c85053

2012-10-31 Thread Michael H. Warfield
Wow... Pulling for testing. I see some stuff related to devtmpfs that relates to the systemd / Fedora 17 issues Serge and I have been working on for the last couple of weeks. I'm going to test these out. It's been an intense couple of weeks getting THAT to work. Even without some of the additi

Re: [lxc-devel] [Lxc-users] [systemd-devel] Unable to run systemd in an LXC / cgroup container.

2012-10-31 Thread Serge Hallyn
Can you tell me the exact git tree and branch you are using? The results you're getting don't make sense to me... Hoping I can find a simple answer. -serge -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps f

Re: [lxc-devel] [Lxc-users] [systemd-devel] Unable to run systemd in an LXC / cgroup container.

2012-10-31 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 18:15 +0100, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Can you tell me the exact git tree and branch you are using? I'm using head. I'm not specifying a tree. > The results you're getting don't make sense to me... Hoping I can find > a simple answer. Me too. > -serge Regards, Mike -- Mich

Re: [lxc-devel] [Lxc-users] [systemd-devel] Unable to run systemd in an LXC / cgroup container.

2012-10-31 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 18:15 +0100, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > Can you tell me the exact git tree and branch you are using? > > I'm using head. I'm not specifying a tree. ? I'm not sure what you mean - are you using git://github.com/lxc/lxc, or the

Re: [lxc-devel] [Lxc-users] [systemd-devel] Unable to run systemd in an LXC / cgroup container.

2012-10-31 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 18:30 +0100, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 18:15 +0100, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > > Can you tell me the exact git tree and branch you are using? > > > > I'm using head. I'm not specifying a tree. > > ? > > I'

Re: [lxc-devel] [Lxc-users] [systemd-devel] Unable to run systemd in an LXC / cgroup container.

2012-10-31 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 10:18 +0100, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > ... > > > Yeah, I don't think I "need to play a game like this" anymore. I'd have > > > to go back through some old old E-Mails to see