Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH 3/3] lxc-rpm-build

2012-09-11 Thread Dwight Engen
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:53:50 -0400 Stéphane Graber wrote: [...] > > The reason I changed them to expand was so the docs would be right > > (they had SUBST paths with ${var} still in them) but obviously I > > don't want to break code just to make the docs right :) > > I'm not actually expending b

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH 3/3] lxc-rpm-build

2012-09-11 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 12-09-11 02:30 PM, Dwight Engen wrote: > On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:53:50 -0400 > Stéphane Graber wrote: > > [...] >>> The reason I changed them to expand was so the docs would be right >>> (they had SUBST paths with ${var} still in them) but obviously I >>> don't want to break code just to make t

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH 3/3] lxc-rpm-build

2012-09-11 Thread Dwight Engen
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:30:22 -0400 Dwight Engen wrote: > On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:53:50 -0400 > Stéphane Graber wrote: > > [...] > > > The reason I changed them to expand was so the docs would be right > > > (they had SUBST paths with ${var} still in them) but obviously I > > > don't want to brea

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH 3/3] lxc-rpm-build

2012-09-11 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 12-09-11 05:06 PM, Dwight Engen wrote: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:30:22 -0400 > Dwight Engen wrote: > >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:53:50 -0400 >> Stéphane Graber wrote: >> >> [...] The reason I changed them to expand was so the docs would be right (they had SUBST paths with ${var} still