On 05/04/2011 08:18 PM, Francois-Xavier Bourlet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ok I take note about inline patches in email.
>
> - About your version of lxc_for_each, your version is a lots better.
> My code was totally stupid and non-performant. In fact I based my code
> on something else that was needed the sc
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "lxc".
The branch, master has been updated
via f66331efb095656e555d65e413808dc8d3f71587 (commit)
via f2b2ec3160452acb017c75a5
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "lxc".
The branch, lxc-0.7.4.X has been updated
via b3c7b19a0de4a7ba74e6d46a01dccbc75c9a3c20 (commit)
via ed57edc0ad52692272c
ok thanks for all the information and example.
I believe that rather than trying to iterate over every containers
running or not and trying to merge the result we could simply iterate
only on running container, or only stopped container (I simplify). So
lxc_for_each could simply take a state in pa
