Is the share_via_fs patch intended to be integrated into the kernel ?
> Hello Mr Lezcano,
>
> i have tested your patch with kernel version 2.6.33.2 and it worked
> very well for me.
>
> For testing purposes i have written a little script using socat and the
> util-linux-ng tool unshare - i s
Julian Thomé wrote:
>
> Is the share_via_fs patch intended to be integrated into the kernel ?
Not in this form. From the userspace pov, there is no changes, but in
the kernel there are some cleanup and robustness to do around
SCM_CREDENTIALS and co.
I think nobody will be against sharing af_un
Julian Thomé wrote:
>
> Is the share_via_fs patch intended to be integrated into the kernel ?
Not in this form. From the userspace pov, there is no changes, but in
the kernel there are some cleanup and robustness to do around
SCM_CREDENTIALS and co.
I think nobody will be against sharing af_un
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Ferenc Wagner writes:
>
>> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>>
>>> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>>
Daniel Lezcano writes:
> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> While playing with lxc-start, I noticed that /tmp is infested by
>> empty lxc-r* directories: [...] Ok, this name
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>
>
>> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>>>
>>>
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> I'd like to use lxc-start as a wrapper, invisible to the parent and
> the (jailed) child. Of course I c
