On 05/23/2010 01:23 PM, Denis Rizaev wrote:
> Patch attached. Applies against latest git.
>
Applied. Thanks Denis !
--
___
Lxc-devel mailing list
Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforg
Patch attached. Applies against latest git.
2010/5/20 Daniel Lezcano
> On 05/19/2010 11:07 PM, Denis Rizaev wrote:
> > I did a little investigation about runlevels and i think we can assume
> > runlevels 2-5 as normal.
> > So, we can check if system was in runlevel 2-5 and proc count is 1 and
>
On 05/19/2010 11:07 PM, Denis Rizaev wrote:
> I did a little investigation about runlevels and i think we can assume
> runlevels 2-5 as normal.
> So, we can check if system was in runlevel 2-5 and proc count is 1 and now
> we are in 0/6.
> I can prepare patch tomorrow if you agree with my idea.
De
I did a little investigation about runlevels and i think we can assume
runlevels 2-5 as normal.
So, we can check if system was in runlevel 2-5 and proc count is 1 and now
we are in 0/6.
I can prepare patch tomorrow if you agree with my idea.
2010/5/20 Daniel Lezcano
>
> Fixed 2) with commits :
>
On 05/10/2010 06:40 PM, Denis Rizaev wrote:
> Hi folks.
> I'm using latest lxc git tools on ubuntu host with debian containers.
> And there are some bugs:
> 1) In ubuntu, the default runlevel is 2, not 3. That's why reboot and halt
> aren't handled properly. I've fixed it — patch is attached. But i
Denis Rizaev wrote:
> Hi folks.
> I'm using latest lxc git tools on ubuntu host with debian containers.
> And there are some bugs:
> 1) In ubuntu, the default runlevel is 2, not 3. That's why reboot and halt
> aren't handled properly. I've fixed it — patch is attached. But it's a
> distro-specific
