On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 12:19 -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> Oops, sorry if I caused a few conflicts with your upcoming patchset...
> We had the fedora 19 fix as a pull request on github for a while so I
> just applied it when going through the outstanding merge proposals this
> morning.
> Then g
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 12:19 -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> Oops, sorry if I caused a few conflicts with your upcoming patchset...
> We had the fedora 19 fix as a pull request on github for a while so I
> just applied it when going through the outstanding merge proposals this
> morning.
> Then g
Oops, sorry if I caused a few conflicts with your upcoming patchset...
We had the fedora 19 fix as a pull request on github for a while so I
just applied it when going through the outstanding merge proposals this
morning.
Then git complained about a mixed tab/space in that patch, so I looked
at t
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 12:12 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Ah Crap... Just when I'm almost done regression testing my updates to
> the lxc-fedora template...
> Stéphane,
> When did this come in? I thought I had already fixed that version
> gotcha for Fedora 19 (which is now up to -4 in up
Ah Crap... Just when I'm almost done regression testing my updates to
the lxc-fedora template...
Stéphane,
When did this come in? I thought I had already fixed that version
gotcha for Fedora 19 (which is now up to -4 in updates) and that it had
been committed to staging long before Linux Plumbe
