Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH] utmp.h: Don't fail when utmpx.h isn't present

2013-01-10 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com): > Following a comment on the mailing-list, I made utmp.h return -1 > when it's disabled, the problem with that is that it prevents the > container from starting completely, which isn't quite what I wanted. > > This change makes the function succeed, t

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH] utmp.h: Don't fail when utmpx.h isn't present

2013-01-10 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 01/10/2013 05:13 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > Following a comment on the mailing-list, I made utmp.h return -1 > when it's disabled, the problem with that is that it prevents the > container from starting completely, which isn't quite what I wanted. > > This change makes the function succeed, t