Not at all as I already did it on my tree, sending in a minute as v4...
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 02:53:33PM -0400, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> > Do you want me to sync this on top of staging and re-send?I think they
> are
> > conflicting right
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 02:53:33PM -0400, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> Do you want me to sync this on top of staging and re-send?I think they are
> conflicting right now.
Ah, if you don't mind, that'd be great (I started doing it but I'm
getting interrupted quite a bit since I'm attending a conference)!
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 03:11:28PM -0400, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> Not at all as I already did it on my tree, sending in a minute as v4...
Thanks, and pushed!
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 02:53:33PM -0400, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> > >
Do you want me to sync this on top of staging and re-send?I think they are
conflicting right now.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:01:11PM -0400, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> > get_ips accepts an interface name as a parameter but there was no
> > way
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:01:11PM -0400, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> get_ips accepts an interface name as a parameter but there was no
> way to get the interfaces names from the container. This patch
> introduces a new get_interfaces call to the API so that users
> can obtain the name of the interfaces
