Quoting Natanael Copa (nc...@alpinelinux.org):
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:54:58 -0600
> Serge Hallyn wrote:
>
> > Successful runs of
> > https://code.launchpad.net/~serge-hallyn/+junk/lxc-test with your
> > patches will also be reassuring.
>
> This is causing problems for me:
>
> if dist[0]
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:54:58 -0600
Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Successful runs of
> https://code.launchpad.net/~serge-hallyn/+junk/lxc-test with your
> patches will also be reassuring.
This is causing problems for me:
if dist[0] != "Ubuntu":
print >>sys.stderr, "This test suite does not
Quoting Natanael Copa (nc...@alpinelinux.org):
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:54:58 -0600
> Serge Hallyn wrote:
>
> > Quoting Natanael Copa (nc...@alpinelinux.org):
>
> forgot this...
>
> > > Would you be prepared for minor sacrifices to use posix compliant
> > > shell scripts?
> >
> > Someone else
Quoting Natanael Copa (nc...@alpinelinux.org):
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:54:58 -0600
> Serge Hallyn wrote:
>
> > (Note also that lxc-ls may be rewritten in python. Is that a problem
> > for your use case?)
>
> well... The Alpine Linux base system is 6MB excluding kernel. I offer
> to spend a da
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:50:54 -0500
"Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
> Converting from bash to ash (which is very sh like) isn't too bad if
> you are not making extensive use of arrays and string functions. It's
> probably doable (having done it myself with some fairly sophisticated
> bash scripts de
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:54:58 -0600
Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Natanael Copa (nc...@alpinelinux.org):
forgot this...
> > Would you be prepared for minor sacrifices to use posix compliant
> > shell scripts?
>
> Someone else can jump in if they object, but I personally don't. Are
> you willi
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:54:58 -0600
Serge Hallyn wrote:
> (Note also that lxc-ls may be rewritten in python. Is that a problem
> for your use case?)
well... The Alpine Linux base system is 6MB excluding kernel. I offer
to spend a day or so to save 700kb by getting rid of bash.
and now you want
On 11/14/2012 01:50 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 09:54 -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>> Quoting Natanael Copa (nc...@alpinelinux.org):
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I wonder if it there are any interest to make the scripts posix shell
>>> compliant so they can run with for example busybox
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 09:54 -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Natanael Copa (nc...@alpinelinux.org):
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wonder if it there are any interest to make the scripts posix shell
> > compliant so they can run with for example busybox ash and dash.
> >
> > I would like to provide proper
Quoting Natanael Copa (nc...@alpinelinux.org):
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if it there are any interest to make the scripts posix shell
> compliant so they can run with for example busybox ash and dash.
>
> I would like to provide proper LCX support for Alpine Linux, which by
> default runs from tmpfs. It
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:04:43 +0100
Natanael Copa wrote:
> @@ -18,10 +18,11 @@
> # Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA
> 02111-1307 USA
> lxc_path=@LXCPATH@
> +program=${0##*/}
>
> usage()
> {
> - echo "usage: $(basename $0) [--active] [--] [LS_OPTIONS...]"
> >&2
>
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 08:40:39 +0100
Natanael Copa wrote:
> I wonder if it there are any interest to make the scripts posix shell
> compliant so they can run with for example busybox ash and dash.
I should maybe add that I think the biggest challenge will be the
longopts parsing. That said I have
Hi,
I wonder if it there are any interest to make the scripts posix shell
compliant so they can run with for example busybox ash and dash.
I would like to provide proper LCX support for Alpine Linux, which by
default runs from tmpfs. It uses uclibc and busybox as the base system,
which makes it v
13 matches
Mail list logo
