Re: [lxc-devel] lxc on ia64

2011-12-06 Thread Vadym S. Khondar
On пн, 05-гру-2011 23:12:39 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 12/01/2011 05:23 PM, Vadym S. Khondar wrote: >> Hello everybody. >> > > Ha! great someone willing to run lxc on itanium :) > > Can you try this patch ? > > Index: lxc/src/lxc/namespace.c > ===

Re: [lxc-devel] lxc on ia64

2011-12-05 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 12/01/2011 05:23 PM, Vadym S. Khondar wrote: > Hello everybody. > > Not sure if I am posting on the right list with this question. > > I'm interested in project status on ia64 platform. > > The latest tar.gzs have a check within configure concerning system where > package is being built and ia6

Re: [lxc-devel] lxc on ia64

2011-12-02 Thread Greg Kurz
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 23:59 +0200, Vadym S. Khondar wrote: > > I guess something like this should fix the issue: > > > > --- a/src/lxc/namespace.c > > +++ b/src/lxc/namespace.c > > @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ pid_t lxc_clone(int (*fn)(void *), void *arg, int > > flags) > > pid_t ret; > > > > #ifdef __i

Re: [lxc-devel] lxc on ia64

2011-12-01 Thread Vadym S. Khondar
01.12.11 23:30, Greg Kurz написав(ла): > On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 18:23 +0200, Vadym S. Khondar wrote: >> Hello everybody. >> > > Hi, > > > This sounds like you're on the right list. :) > > > Heh, ia64 is a rare and strange beast Absolutely agree! > that uses the stack upward from > the bottom add

Re: [lxc-devel] lxc on ia64

2011-12-01 Thread Greg Kurz
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 18:23 +0200, Vadym S. Khondar wrote: > Hello everybody. > Hi, > Not sure if I am posting on the right list with this question. > > I'm interested in project status on ia64 platform. > This sounds like you're on the right list. :) > The latest tar.gzs have a check within

[lxc-devel] lxc on ia64

2011-12-01 Thread Vadym S. Khondar
Hello everybody. Not sure if I am posting on the right list with this question. I'm interested in project status on ia64 platform. The latest tar.gzs have a check within configure concerning system where package is being built and ia64 is not there. Minor hack allows to bypass this limitation