On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 14:22 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> I'd say we should setpgrp the container init, forward all signals we
> can to it, and have a configuration option for the set of signals
> which
> should be forwarded to the full process group of the container init.
> Or does it make sense t
Daniel Lezcano writes:
> On 05/13/2010 02:22 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> I attached a proof-of-concept patch which seems to work good enough for
>> me. The function names are somewhat off now, but I leave that for later
>
> do you have definitive version for this ?
> I have some modifications
On 05/13/2010 02:22 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
[ ... ]
> I attached a proof-of-concept patch which seems to work good enough for
> me. The function names are somewhat off now, but I leave that for later
>
Ferenc,
do you have definitive version for this ?
I have some modifications in the star
On 05/13/2010 02:22 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>
>
>> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>>>
>>>
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>
>
>> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>
>
Daniel Lezcano writes:
> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>>
>>> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>>
Daniel Lezcano writes:
> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> I'd like to use lxc-start as a wrapper, invisible to the parent and
>> the (jailed
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>
>
>> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>>>
>>>
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> I'd like to use lxc-start as a wrapper, invisible to the parent and
> the (jailed) child. Of course I c
