Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>
>
>> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>>>
>>>
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>
>
>> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Actually, I'm not sure you can fully solve this. If r
"Michael H. Warfield" writes:
> On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 23:18 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
>> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>>>
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>
>> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, I'm not
Daniel Lezcano writes:
> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>>
>>> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>>
Daniel Lezcano writes:
> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> Actually, I'm not sure you can fully solve this. If rootfs is a
>> separate file
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>
>
>> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>>>
>>>
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Actually, I'm not sure you can fully solve this. If rootfs is a
> separate file system, this is only mu
Daniel Lezcano writes:
> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>>
>>> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>>
Actually, I'm not sure you can fully solve this. If rootfs is a
separate file system, this is only much ado about nothing. If rootfs
isn't a separate filesystem, you
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>
>
>> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>>>
>>>
We can't simply remove it because of the pivot_root which returns
EBUSY. I suppose it's coming from: "new_root and put_old must not
be on the sa
Daniel Lezcano writes:
> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>>
>>> We can't simply remove it because of the pivot_root which returns
>>> EBUSY. I suppose it's coming from: "new_root and put_old must not
>>> be on the same file system as the current root."
>>
>> Hmm, this co
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>
>
>> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Ferenc Wagner writes:
>>>
>>>
Daniel Lezcano writes:
> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>
>> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>>
>>
Daniel Lezcano writes:
> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> Ferenc Wagner writes:
>>
>>> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>>>
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>
>> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>
>>> While playing with lxc-start, I noticed that /tmp is infested by
>
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Ferenc Wagner writes:
>
>> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>>
>>> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>>
Daniel Lezcano writes:
> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> While playing with lxc-start, I noticed that /tmp is infested by
>> empty lxc-r* directories: [...] Ok, this name
10 matches
Mail list logo