On 04/11/2013 09:53 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On 04/11/2013 09:18 AM, Jäkel, Guido wrote:
>> I also think that "LXC should have as less dependencies as possible to ease
>> the support for different plattforms" has more weight than "don't invent
>> things twice".
>>
>> quoting Daniel Lezcano:
>
On 04/11/2013 09:18 AM, Jäkel, Guido wrote:
> I also think that "LXC should have as less dependencies as possible to ease
> the support for different plattforms" has more weight than "don't invent
> things twice".
>
> quoting Daniel Lezcano:
>> I think the solution to solve this issue is to use
I also think that "LXC should have as less dependencies as possible to ease the
support for different plattforms" has more weight than "don't invent things
twice".
quoting Daniel Lezcano:
>I think the solution to solve this issue is to use the AF_INET protocol
>on the loopback using the loopback
