On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 14:25 +, Jäkel, Guido wrote:
> >> So I'd rather not abuse the sticky bit for that kind of thing,
> >> especially as there's no good reason to do so.
> >> We can very simply create a separate state file that's removed on
> >> shutdown, or just use the one we already have (
>> So I'd rather not abuse the sticky bit for that kind of thing,
>> especially as there's no good reason to do so.
>> We can very simply create a separate state file that's removed on
>> shutdown, or just use the one we already have (rootfs.hold).
>
>I have to also concur with this. I would be ap
