Quoting Christian Seiler (christ...@iwakd.de):
> Hi Serge,
>
> > Thanks, Christian. I did need the trivial white-space-damaged patch below,
> > but
> > with that it built and ran for me, both with %n and default (/lxc/%n)
> > patterns.
> > This was in a nested container, I haven't tested at hos
Quoting Christian Seiler (christ...@iwakd.de):
> Hi Serge,
>
> > Thanks, Christian. I did need the trivial white-space-damaged patch below,
> > but
> > with that it built and ran for me, both with %n and default (/lxc/%n)
> > patterns.
> > This was in a nested container, I haven't tested at hos
Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@ubuntu.com):
> Quoting Christian Seiler (christ...@iwakd.de):
> > Hi Serge,
> >
> > > Thanks, Christian. I did need the trivial white-space-damaged patch
> > > below, but
> > > with that it built and ran for me, both with %n and default (/lxc/%n)
> > > pattern
Quoting Christian Seiler (christ...@iwakd.de):
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed previously, I've now done a major rewrite of the entire
> cgroup logic. There are now no assumptions made whatsoever when it
> comes to the cgroup mount points, the kernel information will be used
> to determine the proper l
Hi Serge,
> Thanks, Christian. I did need the trivial white-space-damaged patch below,
> but
> with that it built and ran for me, both with %n and default (/lxc/%n)
> patterns.
> This was in a nested container, I haven't tested at host level but have no
> reason to think that would fail if nest
Hi all,
As discussed previously, I've now done a major rewrite of the entire
cgroup logic. There are now no assumptions made whatsoever when it
comes to the cgroup mount points, the kernel information will be used
to determine the proper locations for everything. (Only /proc is
assumed to be worki
