Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH 2/3] add lsm op for checking if an lsm is present/enabled

2013-10-16 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com): > Signed-off-by: Dwight Engen Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn I do wonder if the name should be more precise (host_lsm_enabled() or host_lsm_enforcing() or something). Just the name 'enabled' could lead some to believe that it means it is enabled for t

[lxc-devel] [PATCH 2/3] add lsm op for checking if an lsm is present/enabled

2013-10-15 Thread Dwight Engen
Signed-off-by: Dwight Engen --- src/lxc/lsm/apparmor.c | 1 + src/lxc/lsm/lsm.c | 7 +++ src/lxc/lsm/lsm.h | 3 +++ src/lxc/lsm/nop.c | 6 ++ src/lxc/lsm/selinux.c | 1 + 5 files changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/lxc/lsm/apparmor.c b/src/lxc/lsm/apparmor.c index