Quoting Richard Weinberger (rich...@nod.at):
> Am 17.04.2013 14:55, schrieb Serge Hallyn:
> >Quoting Richard Weinberger (rich...@nod.at):
> >>There is no need to use nested functions voodoo.
> >
> >I see no downside to this, but what is the upside?
>
> There is absolute no reason to use a GNU C ex
Am 17.04.2013 14:55, schrieb Serge Hallyn:
> Quoting Richard Weinberger (rich...@nod.at):
>> There is no need to use nested functions voodoo.
>
> I see no downside to this, but what is the upside?
There is absolute no reason to use a GNU C extension here which makes
the code incompatible to other
There is no need to use nested functions voodoo.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
---
src/lxc/lxc_init.c | 13 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_init.c b/src/lxc/lxc_init.c
index c83c2f1..e4c9a32 100644
--- a/src/lxc/lxc_init.c
+++ b/src/lxc
Quoting Richard Weinberger (rich...@nod.at):
> There is no need to use nested functions voodoo.
I see no downside to this, but what is the upside?
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
> ---
> src/lxc/lxc_init.c | 13 ++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git