Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
> On 05/29/2013 11:21 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > And update the comment explaining the locking.
> >
> > Also take memlock in want_daemonize.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn
>
> Is that patch still relevant?
>
> It doesn't appear to have been
On 05/29/2013 11:21 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> And update the comment explaining the locking.
>
> Also take memlock in want_daemonize.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn
Is that patch still relevant?
It doesn't appear to have been reviewed/applied to staging and touches
bits that have been changed
Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> On Wed, 29 May 2013 22:21:22 -0500
> Serge Hallyn wrote:
>
> > And update the comment explaining the locking.
> >
> > Also take memlock in want_daemonize.
>
> Hi Serge, could you explain a bit what the locking is protecting about
> open/close? I
Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> On Wed, 29 May 2013 22:21:22 -0500
> Serge Hallyn wrote:
>
> > And update the comment explaining the locking.
> >
> > Also take memlock in want_daemonize.
>
> Hi Serge, could you explain a bit what the locking is protecting about
> open/close? I
On Wed, 29 May 2013 22:21:22 -0500
Serge Hallyn wrote:
> And update the comment explaining the locking.
>
> Also take memlock in want_daemonize.
Hi Serge, could you explain a bit what the locking is protecting about
open/close? It looks like you are locking around just the open or
just the clos
And update the comment explaining the locking.
Also take memlock in want_daemonize.
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn
---
src/lxc/lxccontainer.c | 153 +
1 file changed, 115 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c b/src/lxc/l
