Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH] clang: Remaining changes

2013-10-23 Thread Stéphane Graber
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:04:58PM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com): > > Those are a bit less obvious than those I pushed directly to master. > > All those changes were required to build LXC under clang here. > > > > With this, gcc can be replaced by clang

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH] clang: Remaining changes

2013-10-23 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com): > Those are a bit less obvious than those I pushed directly to master. > All those changes were required to build LXC under clang here. > > With this, gcc can be replaced by clang to build LXC so long as you're > not using the python3 binding (as pyth

[lxc-devel] [PATCH] clang: Remaining changes

2013-10-23 Thread Stéphane Graber
Those are a bit less obvious than those I pushed directly to master. All those changes were required to build LXC under clang here. With this, gcc can be replaced by clang to build LXC so long as you're not using the python3 binding (as python extensions can't be built under clang at the moment).