On 03/13/2013 08:19 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On 03/13/2013 08:14 PM, Alexander Vladimirov wrote:
>> I am unable to reproduce it with my containers, can you show config
>> used to test?
>
> http://paste.ubuntu.com/5612341/
>
> As far as we can tell so far, the code looks fine but something is
On 03/13/2013 08:14 PM, Alexander Vladimirov wrote:
> I am unable to reproduce it with my containers, can you show config
> used to test?
http://paste.ubuntu.com/5612341/
As far as we can tell so far, the code looks fine but something is
somehow setting the value in the struct to -1. It's not any
I am unable to reproduce it with my containers, can you show config
used to test?
2013/3/14 Stéphane Graber :
> On 03/12/2013 09:37 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>> Quoting Alexander Vladimirov (alexander.idkfa.vladimi...@gmail.com):
>>> I remember discussion about implementing proper way to shutdown
>>
On 03/12/2013 09:37 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Alexander Vladimirov (alexander.idkfa.vladimi...@gmail.com):
>> I remember discussion about implementing proper way to shutdown
>> guests using different signals, so here's a patch proposal.
>> It allows to use specific signal numbers to shutdow
Quoting Alexander Vladimirov (alexander.idkfa.vladimi...@gmail.com):
> I remember discussion about implementing proper way to shutdown
> guests using different signals, so here's a patch proposal.
> It allows to use specific signal numbers to shutdown guests
> gracefully, for example SIGRTMIN+4 sta
I remember discussion about implementing proper way to shutdown
guests using different signals, so here's a patch proposal.
It allows to use specific signal numbers to shutdown guests
gracefully, for example SIGRTMIN+4 starts poweroff.target in
systemd.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Vladimirov
---
do
