On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:34 PM, wrote:
> It seems that we did not the same kind of utils.
> You have made init.d, start, stop and status scripts (for debian-like
> distro).
> It could proposed to the debian package maintainer.
Sure, I'd be happy to have contributions to the debian package! :)
(b
Le 03/02/2010 12:02, Dominik Schulz a écrit :
> Am Montag 01 Februar 2010 08:51:56 schrieb l...@zitta.fr:
>
>> Dominik, you said that you started some work. anything visible?
>>
> You can fetch my work from the "tex" branch at http://git.gauner.org/lxc-
> debian.git/.
>
>
It seems that w
Am Montag 01 Februar 2010 08:51:56 schrieb l...@zitta.fr:
> Dominik, you said that you started some work. anything visible?
You can fetch my work from the "tex" branch at http://git.gauner.org/lxc-
debian.git/.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
Dominik
signature.asc
Description: This is
Le 01/02/2010 00:15, Daniel Lezcano a écrit :
> Dominik Schulz wrote:
>
>> Am Samstag 30 Januar 2010 21:54:29 schrieb Guillaume ZITTA:
>>
>>> Sorry for the late response, I was on holidays.
>>> I do think joining efforts is always a good thing.
>>> I think some things needs to be defined :
Dominik Schulz wrote:
> Am Samstag 30 Januar 2010 21:54:29 schrieb Guillaume ZITTA:
>> Sorry for the late response, I was on holidays.
>> I do think joining efforts is always a good thing.
>> I think some things needs to be defined :
>> - best practices for a good container is (no udev, syslog conf
Am Samstag 30 Januar 2010 21:54:29 schrieb Guillaume ZITTA:
> Sorry for the late response, I was on holidays.
> I do think joining efforts is always a good thing.
> I think some things needs to be defined :
> - best practices for a good container is (no udev, syslog conf...)
> - what minimal featur
Hi,
Sorry for the late response, I was on holidays.
I do think joining efforts is always a good thing.
I think some things needs to be defined :
- best practices for a good container is (no udev, syslog conf...)
- what minimal features we expect from container creation scripts.
- who works on it.
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 01:01 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
: - Snip...
> FOUND IT!
> [r...@alcove ~]# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/accept_ra
> 1
> r...@ubuntu:~# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/accept_ra
> 0
> That's what was killing me and blocking autoconf in Debian. I set that
> to 1
Sorry... Long quote of my own post with no snip. Too much is
relevant...
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 23:43 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 02:18 +0100, Michael Holzt wrote:
>
> : - snip
>
> > I haven't played with ipv6 for some years, but i'm sure that your
> > problems c
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 02:18 +0100, Michael Holzt wrote:
: - snip
> I haven't played with ipv6 for some years, but i'm sure that your
> problems can be fixed without much work. For starters i would try
> something like this:
> interface foo inet6 manual
> pre-up ifconfig foo up
Well, it w
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 02:18 +0100, Michael Holzt wrote:
> > I just find the whole networking model in Debian to be frustrating. It
> > is probably the number 1 primary reason why I don't use Debian more and
> > won't be incorporating it into future projects.
> Now, this is really offtopic on thi
> I just find the whole networking model in Debian to be frustrating. It
> is probably the number 1 primary reason why I don't use Debian more and
> won't be incorporating it into future projects.
Now, this is really offtopic on this list, but i feel that you might
have missed how flexible the d
Suno,
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 23:27 +0100, Suno Ano wrote:
> Combining forces would be great. I just took a glance at
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/lxc-provider/ and the thing that sprung
> my eyes are
>
> - it is a bit Ubuntu focused as it is coded right now
> - assumes using a bridge i.e.
13 matches
Mail list logo
