On 04/23/2013 09:59 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On 04/23/2013 01:28 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>> Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
>>> I'm not a big user of lxc-clone (yet) but I think as we redesign that
>>> part of the code, consistency across backend should be a primary goal
>>> even
On 04/21/2013 03:37 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>
> Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@ubuntu.com):
>> Any feedback on this patch?
>>
>> I also have a question on behavior details. Until now, we've set up
>> btrfs containers so that $lxcpath is a subvolume, and then each
>> $rootfs is a subvolume. W
On 04/23/2013 10:51 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> If we don't set the block device as lxc.rootfs, then the host has to
> mount the LVM outside of the container's mount namespace, which we
> prefer not to have to do, especially as you get into a chicken and egg
> problem where the LVM path is set in