Re: [lxc-devel] [Fwd: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing control.]

2010-03-08 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> > For me (and others wanting to try the latest and greatest > features > > about the containers) it would be a very good idea to either provide > a > > clean patch for the proposed features. And even maybe someone could > > provide a branch of the latest stable kernel with these patches > ont

Re: [lxc-devel] [patch 3/3][RFC] implement lxc-cmd and lxc-enter using lxc_cinit daemon

2010-01-25 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> For logging the container output, we can create a tty in lxc-start.c, > map the slave endpoint to /dev/console and proxy the master to the real > tty. > That allows to: > * solve the problem of the init process which stole the terminal tty, > letting us in a terminal without the controling tty >

Re: [lxc-devel] [patch 3/3][RFC] implement lxc-cmd and lxc-enter using lxc_cinit daemon

2010-01-25 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> I was wondering if we shouldn't separate the "init-logger" features. > > For logging the container output, we can create a tty in lxc-start.c, > map the slave endpoint to /dev/console and proxy the master to the real > tty. > That allows to: > * solve the problem of the init process which stole